2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-35982012000800008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tabapuã breed in Northeastern Brazil: genetic progress and population structure

Abstract: -The objective of this study was to evaluate the history of the Tabapuã breed in Northeastern Brazil by determining its population structure and genetic progress. Pedigree information from animals born in the period between 1965 and 2006 and weight-adjusted data at 205 (W205), 365 (W365) and 550 (W550) days of age for bovines born between 1975 and 2006 were used. The (co)variance components and genetic value were estimated using the application MTDFREML. Also, the software ENDOG was used for pedigree analysis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AGIs obtained here were similar to those reported by Faria et al (2001) for SIN (7.96 years), by Faria et al (2009) for NEL, GIR and GUZ between 1994 and 1998 (about 8 years), by Reis Filho et al, (2010) for animals of the Dairy Gir subpopulation (8.25 years), by Peixoto et al (2010) for a GUZ subpopulation selected for milk production (7.48 years), and by Caires et al (2012) for TAB (7.3 years). Notably, the generation intervals were always longer for IND animals, reflecting the problems related to the drastic reduction in the census of this breed in recent years, which delays the replacement of animals in the herds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The AGIs obtained here were similar to those reported by Faria et al (2001) for SIN (7.96 years), by Faria et al (2009) for NEL, GIR and GUZ between 1994 and 1998 (about 8 years), by Reis Filho et al, (2010) for animals of the Dairy Gir subpopulation (8.25 years), by Peixoto et al (2010) for a GUZ subpopulation selected for milk production (7.48 years), and by Caires et al (2012) for TAB (7.3 years). Notably, the generation intervals were always longer for IND animals, reflecting the problems related to the drastic reduction in the census of this breed in recent years, which delays the replacement of animals in the herds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For W365, the heritability estimate was of moderate magnitude (0.23). Ribeiro et al (2007) and Caires et al (2012) obtained heritabilities of 0.21 and 0.26, respectively, in Tabapuã cattle, similar to that observed in the present study, whereas Sakaguti et al (2003) and Oliveira et al (2017) obtained higher estimates, 0.36 and 0.37, for Tabapuã and Nellore animals, respectively. The heritability for W550 was also of moderate magnitude (0.19).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Most studies reporting genetic parameters for Tabapuã cattle only consider growth traits (Sakaguti et al, 2003;Campêlo et al, 2004;Ferraz Filho et al, 2004;Pereira et al, 2005;Ribeiro et al, 2007;Sousa Júnior et al, 2010;Caires et al, 2012;Menezes et al, 2013;Bernardes et al, 2015;Oliveira et al, 2015;Campos et al, 2016;Oliveira et al, 2017;Sousa Júnior et al, 2019). Reports are very scarce for reproductive traits (Pereira et al, 2005;Bernardes et al, 2015), and there are no studies for carcass traits in this breed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the accuracy of these comparisons depends on the degree of connectedness among MU: the higher the connectedness, the more reliable the comparison. Genetic connectedness has traditionally been calculated through pedigree-based methods ( Lewis et al, 1999b ; Kuehn et al, 2007a ); however, these methods may underestimate connectedness in production systems such as the beef cattle industry, where commercial herds are poorly registered and multi-sire mating is practiced ( Caires et al, 2012 ; Barbosa et al, 2013 ; Tonussi et al., 2017 ; Cavani et al, 2018 ). A lack of connectedness occurs: when the MU are genetically isolated (or semi-isolated) or there is limited sharing of genetic material; with the use of an incomplete numerator relationship matrix based on poor pedigree data ( Carneiro et al, 2001 ); and with poor use of artificial insemination (AI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%