2007
DOI: 10.1002/aehe.3205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Table of Contents

Abstract: Introduction, Context, and OverviewDefinitions and Conceptual FrameworkMajor Theoretical Perspectives on Student Success in CollegeSociological PerspectivesOrganizational PerspectivesPsychological PerspectivesCultural PerspectivesEconomic PerspectivesSummaryThe Foundation for Student Success: Student Background Characteristics, Precollege Experiences, and Enrollment PatternsStudent DemographicsFamily and Peer SupportAcademic Preparation and Motivation to LearnEnrollment Choices and PatternsSummaryStudent Behav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 239 publications
(290 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…d 1 (difficult), 2 (somewhat easy), 3 (easy), and 4 (very easy). empirically linked to student engagement (process indicators) (Chickering & Gamson, 1987;Kuh et al, 2007) are deserving of considerable attention in curriculum design. This study supported previous literature, which found high levels of student engagement in active, TBL formatted courses (Lightner et al, 2007;Tucker, 2012).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…d 1 (difficult), 2 (somewhat easy), 3 (easy), and 4 (very easy). empirically linked to student engagement (process indicators) (Chickering & Gamson, 1987;Kuh et al, 2007) are deserving of considerable attention in curriculum design. This study supported previous literature, which found high levels of student engagement in active, TBL formatted courses (Lightner et al, 2007;Tucker, 2012).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuh et al (2007) purported student engagement lies at the intersection of institutional conditions and student behaviors. This study focused on the central area of Figure 1, paying attention to teaching and learning approaches (institutional conditions) and various student behaviors.…”
Section: Theoretical/conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To better understand why some students complete a MOOC while others do not, an understanding of student engagement, particularly in online courses, is helpful. Drawing from different studies, Trowler (2010) defines student engagement as a degree of participation in education-related activities that happen in and out of the classroom that is closely related to intended and measurable learning outcomes (Hu & Kuh, 2001;Krause & Coates, 2008;Kuh et al, 2007). According to Trowler, student engagement is an outcome of complex interactions, namely, 'the interaction between the time, effort and other relevant resources' (p. 2) that can be acquired through the investments of students and their educational institutions.…”
Section: Student Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%