TabletInVR

Surale, Hemant Bhaskar; Gupta, Aakar; Hancock, Mark; Vogel, Daniel

doi:10.1145/3290605.3300243

Cited by 92 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Existing taxonomies of AR/VR systems [40,59] mainly describe systems in terms of what capabilities the display hardware afords. Other analyses of immersive software are largely focused on specifc domain areas, such as industrial manufacturing [12], games [14], automotive applications [69], or medicine [20]; specifc functionality, such as visualizing relationships between physical and virtual information [43]; or specifc interactions, such as gestures, gaze [26], or using a tablet alongside a VR headset [17,61]. The results of an extensive AR gesture elicitation study demonstrate that the space for gestures in AR is quite large [52].…”

Section: The Space Of Mixed-reality Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…may also impact the usability of certain interactions. Prior work has shown the scale of virtual objects in AR can have an efect on expected gestural interaction [51], and diferent interaction techniques have been used to manipulate virtual objects at diferent distances from the user with success [61]. Similarly, diferent accessible interaction techniques are needed for these various situations.…”

Section: Additional Contextual Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Making Mobile Augmented Reality Applications Accessible

Herskovitz

White

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Augmented Reality (AR) technology creates new immersive experiences in entertainment, games, education, retail, and social media. AR content is often primarily visual and it is challenging to enable access to it non-visually due to the mix of virtual and real-world content. In this paper, we identify common constituent tasks in AR by analyzing existing mobile AR applications for iOS, and characterize the design space of tasks that require accessible alternatives. For each of the major task categories, we create prototype accessible alternatives that we evaluate in a study with 10 blind participants to explore their perceptions of accessible AR. Our study demonstrates that these prototypes make AR possible to use for blind users and reveals a number of insights to move forward. We believe our work sets forth not only exemplars for developers to create accessible AR applications, but also a roadmap for future research to make AR comprehensively accessible. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI); Accessibility technologies; Mixed / augmented reality.

show abstract

Section: The Space Of Mixed-reality Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Additional Contextual Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Making Mobile Augmented Reality Applications Accessible

Herskovitz

White

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Waggle [82] Tilt me! [39] Tilt scrolling [4,42] Waggle [82] Tilt to share [62] Throw and Tilt [18] Tilting operations [73] TabletInVR [90] Foldable3D [8] Semi- [22] Contin.…”

Section: Design Space Of Digital Drawing Boardsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tilt-Responsive Techniques for Digital Drawing Boards

Romat

Collins

Riche

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drawing boards offer a self-stable work surface that is continuously adjustable. On digital displays, such as the Microsoft Surface Studio, these properties open up a class of techniques that sense and respond to tilt adjustments. Each display posture-whether angled high, low, or somewhere in-between-affords some activities, but not others. Because what is appropriate also depends on the application and task, we explore a range of app-specific transitions between reading vs. writing (annotation), public vs. personal, shared person-space vs. task-space, and other nuances of input and feedback, contingent on display angle. Continuous responses provide interactive transitions tailored to each use-case. We show how a variety of knowledge work scenarios can use sensed display adjustments to drive context-appropriate transitions, as well as technical software details of how to best realize these concepts. A preliminary remote user study suggests that techniques must balance effort required to adjust tilt, versus the potential benefits of a sensed transition.

show abstract

“…However, commercial devices, like HTC Vive [2] or Oculus [5] controllers, require onerous environment setup and provide limited interaction space contrary to the nature of nomadic VR [12]. Previous research also exploited different appliances such as smartphone [24], smartwatch [21], tablet [7,30], pen [6,7] as controller proxy, enabling different interaction space in virtual reality. Other hand tracking technologies, like Leap Motion [3] or Oculus Quest [4], can support free-hand interaction and no spatial constraint, however, demanding hands within the camera view which cause missing tracking often time.…”

Section: Input Techniques In Virtual Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

TanGo: Exploring Expressive Tangible Interactions on Head-Mounted Displays

Chang

Chiang

Hsu

et al. 2020

Symposium on Spatial User Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present TanGo, an always-available input modality on VR headset, which can be complementary to current VR accessories. TanGO is an active mechanical structure symmetrically equipped on Head-Mounted Display, enabling 3-dimensional bimanual sliding input with each degree of freedom furnished a brake system driven by micro servo generating totally 6 passive resistive force profiles. TanGo is an all-in-one structure that possess rich input and output while keeping compactness with the trade-offs between size, weight and usability. Users can actively gesture like pushing, shearing, or squeezing with specific output provided while allowing hands to rest in stationary experiences. TanGo also renders users flexibility to switch seamlessly between virtual and real usage in Augmented Reality without additional efforts and instruments. We demonstrate three applications to show the interaction space of TanGo and then discuss its limitation and show future possibilities based on preliminary user feedback.

show abstract

TabletInVR

Cited by 92 publications

References 50 publications

Making Mobile Augmented Reality Applications Accessible

Making Mobile Augmented Reality Applications Accessible

Tilt-Responsive Techniques for Digital Drawing Boards

TanGo: Exploring Expressive Tangible Interactions on Head-Mounted Displays

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About