Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to outline the importance of tacit knowledge in the innovation process and to highlight the way that geographical location not only in uences the relationship between knowledge and innovative activity, but also affects the way that such interaction in uences the geography of innovation and economic activity. After a discussion about the nature of knowledge, the paper explores the relationship that exists between knowledge and geography. The paper then reviews, using as an analytical lens, the growing body of literature on knowledge spillovers which af rm the importance of geography. However, the discussion then seeks to outline some crucial gaps that remain in our conceptualisation of the knowledge spillover and transfer process. The paper then highlights the neglected role of knowledge demand and consumption in a spatial context, before concluding with a review of areas for future research.

Effective environmental management through environmental knowledge management

“…Nonaka et al (1996) defined tacit knowledge as a kind of personal characteristic that is too abstract to transfer or even express using words. Howells (1996) thought that tacit knowledge is a kind of expertise that is not editable. This knowledge is obtained through informal learning behavior and a sequence process.…”

Les déterminants de la fréquence du face-à-face dans les relations interentreprises : une analyse empirique

“…La littérature sur les modes de transmission des informations et connaissances met l'accent sur le contenu des échanges, en particulier leur niveau de complexité (GUILLAIN, 2000 ;HOWELLS, 2002). La distinction théorique usuelle sépare les informations codifiables et celles qualifiées de tacites, c'est-à-dire qui sont transmissibles sans perte de qualité seulement par la coprésence physique.…”

The evolving nature of China's regional innovation systems: Insights from an exploration–exploitation approach

“…Regions, for instance, generally differ in terms of their patterns of industrial specialization and other elements of their innovation systems, leading to differing innovation performances [9]. This is particularly so in the case of China, a large country with considerable regional 5 literature adopts approaches used in studies of national innovation systems (NIS).…”