2012 20th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing 2012
DOI: 10.1109/pdp.2012.86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tackling Algorithmic Skeleton's Inversion of Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the reactive nature of non-functional concerns is better reflected by events. For more details about this SoC approach, and Listing 1: Example: skeleton processing its implementation on Skandium, refer to our previous work [20].…”
Section: Separation Of Concerns Using Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the reactive nature of non-functional concerns is better reflected by events. For more details about this SoC approach, and Listing 1: Example: skeleton processing its implementation on Skandium, refer to our previous work [20].…”
Section: Separation Of Concerns Using Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But inversion of control hides, at the same time, the actual execution flow to the programmer; which is essential to the implementation of nonfunctional concerns like autonomic computing. In our previous work [20], we proposed a solution to tackle skeleton's inversion of control by introducing a novel separation of concerns (SoC) based on event driven programming. This paper shows how to use such SoC for developing self-configuring and self-optimizing skeletons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%