Tackling HIV and gender-based violence in South Africa: how has PEPFAR responded and what are the implications for implementing organizations?

Abstract

South Africa has some of the highest levels of both HIV and gender-based violence (GBV) worldwide. The international literature has highlighted the importance of tackling GBV in the fight against AIDS. Although the link between these epidemics is acknowledged by South Africa's medical and NGO communities, government response has largely dealt with them separately. PEPFAR is South Africa's largest HIV/AIDS donor, representing significant funding potential for programmes seeking to tackle these twin epidemics. Using a combination of policy document analysis and key informant interviews at national and provincial level (Western Cape), we examined PEPFAR's response to the GBV-HIV link, the extent to which PEPFAR is aligned to national policies and the extent to which implementing agencies have felt able to work with PEPFAR funding. A number of PEPFAR-South Africa's positions (e.g. on condoms and abortion) stand in contradiction to South Africa's own laws. While PEPFAR-South Africa officials are adamant that PEPFAR addresses the GBV-HIV link, it does not form an explicit strategic goal and there are no indicators for this work. Although some agencies receiving PEPFAR funding do address the links between GBV and HIV, this appeared incidental rather than the reason for their receipt of PEPFAR funding. Not one implementing agency interviewed agreed with PEPFAR's ideological stance, perceiving it unhelpful and inappropriate in a social context defined by violence and HIV. Nevertheless, many organizations were prepared to apply for funding. Those awarded it found creative ways to work with-or around-PEPFAR's restrictions to ensure delivery of an appropriate range of much needed services to those facing the twin epidemics of HIV and GBV. The recent change in the US administration offers an important opportunity for broader links between HIV and GBV to be supported through PEPFAR. This paper makes recommendations for building a more systematic approach on the current ad hoc experience of PEPFAR in South Africa.

Gender-based violence and HIV sexual risk behavior: Alcohol use and mental health problems as mediators among women in drinking venues, Cape Town

“…Thus, it is important to examine the factors that drive heterosexual risk behavior among women in South Africa. Gender-based violence has long been recognized and continues to be a strong factor in determining women’s HIV risk within sub-Saharan Africa and in South Africa in particular (Campbell, 2002; Dunkle et al, 2004; Dworkin & Ehrhardt, 2007; García-Moreno & Watts, 2000; Ghanotakis et al, 2009; Maman et al, 2000; UNAIDS, WHO, 2005). Intimate relationship violence directed at women is prospectively associated with HIV infection in women.…”

Sex work and the 2010 FIFA World Cup: time for public health imperatives to prevail

“…Rather than directly challenging legal frameworks, some health workers have sought to provide HIV prevention services for sex workers. This indirect approach has been encouraged by international funding agencies such as the US Presidential Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which make funding conditional on a pledge by recipient organisations that they will not advocate for the legalisation of sex work [10-12]. Given the legal and funding impediments to the work of NGOs and the lack of government support for these initiatives, health care programmes have only managed scattered and broadly ineffective attempts at preventing HIV in sex workers in southern Africa, their clients and by extension, the general population [13,14].…”

Challenging Gendered Inequalities in Global Health: Dilemmas for NGOs

“…Nevertheless, many organizations continued to apply for PEPFAR funding, finding various means of subverting the US moral agenda despite the constraints it placed on work on the ground, particularly in relation to women's empowerment (Ghanotakis et al, 2009). This was particularly apparent in South Africa where the HIV/AIDS funds are primarily channelled through the United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).…”

“…PEPFAR is South Africa's largest HIV/AIDS donor but, with a mandate driven from Washington, the stance of PEPFAR South Africa on a number of issues (notably on condoms and abortion) conflicts with South Africa's own laws. Nevertheless, many organizations continued to apply for PEPFAR funding, finding various means of subverting the US moral agenda despite the constraints it placed on work on the ground, particularly in relation to women's empowerment (Ghanotakis et al, 2009). Other concerns can also arise.…”