2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tackling the challenges in the estimation of methane absolute adsorption in kerogen nanoporous media from molecular and analytical approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shale reservoirs are typically associated with an organic content from 0.5 wt % to more than 10 wt % . The organic matter (i.e., kerogen) in shale reservoirs contain a considerable number of nano-scale pores. Type II kerogen is commonly seen in shale media (such as in Bakken formation and Eagle Ford formation). , Type II kerogen can be further divided into four sub-types (types II-A, II-B, II-C, and II-D) from low to high maturity as the atomic O/C and H/C ratios decrease. On the other hand, during the development of shale reservoirs, there is a massive amount of water existing in the shale formations. The possible water sources include (1) connate water, which typically accounts for 10–30% of the pore volume; , ­(2) hydraulic fracturing, in which a large amount of water is injected with only a small portion being recovered (e.g., only 7–22% of the injected fluid is recovered in the Marcellus formation); and (3) water alternating gas flooding, in which massive amounts of water is injected into shale formations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shale reservoirs are typically associated with an organic content from 0.5 wt % to more than 10 wt % . The organic matter (i.e., kerogen) in shale reservoirs contain a considerable number of nano-scale pores. Type II kerogen is commonly seen in shale media (such as in Bakken formation and Eagle Ford formation). , Type II kerogen can be further divided into four sub-types (types II-A, II-B, II-C, and II-D) from low to high maturity as the atomic O/C and H/C ratios decrease. On the other hand, during the development of shale reservoirs, there is a massive amount of water existing in the shale formations. The possible water sources include (1) connate water, which typically accounts for 10–30% of the pore volume; , ­(2) hydraulic fracturing, in which a large amount of water is injected with only a small portion being recovered (e.g., only 7–22% of the injected fluid is recovered in the Marcellus formation); and (3) water alternating gas flooding, in which massive amounts of water is injected into shale formations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different adsorption layers are dictated by the local minima in density profiles at high pressures (500 bar) as in our previous work. 32 Therefore, m abs per SA can be obtained based on the adsorbed phase density and volume in each pore, and the expressions in various adsorption types are given as…”
Section: Characterization Of Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a number of molecular simulation works , have shown that ρ a is dependent on pressure, temperature, and pore size. They also showed that CH 4 adsorption behavior is drastically different in micropores and mesopores. For example, while in micropores (≤2 nm), CH 4 can have a layering structure without the free gas zone, , in mesopores (≥2 nm), the presence of a transition zone beyond the first adsorption layer ,,, can negatively affect m abs calculation. Thus, it is essential to explicitly take into account the pore size distribution (PSD) in shale and the corresponding adsorption behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been numerous experimental works to study the gas adsorption behavior in shale media. ,, Among them, gravimetric and volumetric methods have been widely used to measure the Gibbs adsorption of various hydrocarbon species. , However, neither the gravimetric method nor the volumetric method can measure the adsorbed phase volume; therefore, the measured amount of adsorption is the surface excess adsorption. The surface excess adsorption represents the amount of gas exceeding bulk gas phase density in the system. The absolute adsorption represents the total amount of gas molecules in the sorbed state. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%