2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2186452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tackling the ‘Galácticos’ Effect: Team Familiarity and the Performance of Star-Studded Projects

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, OrganizationalProximity controls for the effect exerted by team members’ familiarity on interaction ease, information and knowledge exchange (Boschma, 2005; Cattani et al., 2013). This variable is measured by the average number of seasons each player was on a given team.…”
Section: Methods and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, OrganizationalProximity controls for the effect exerted by team members’ familiarity on interaction ease, information and knowledge exchange (Boschma, 2005; Cattani et al., 2013). This variable is measured by the average number of seasons each player was on a given team.…”
Section: Methods and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental research has shown, for instance, that groups whose members are involved in stable collaborations tend to develop transactive memory systems or shared mental models that help them coordinate their actions more effectively and perform better than groups lacking such stable collaborations [ 48 52 ]. Developing shared mental models is an essential aspect of learning in groups [ 50 ] as it fosters the diffusion and recombination of knowledge, and a more accurate sense of ‘who knows what’ inside the group [ 21 , 29 , 53 – 55 ]. In our model, we do not examine the role of transactive memory systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the ability to identify the best performing individual is possible in several situations. Since 1972, for instance, the Institutional Investor magazine has annually ranked the top analysts in equity industry group and investment specialty using four levels of awards: first place, second place, third place, and runner-up [ 28 ]; the number of awards and nominations individuals receive or the commercial success of their work is often used to recognize top-performers in industries like film-making, music, advertising, TV and publishing, among the others [ 29 ]; and scientists and engineers who file the largest number of patents and/or publish articles in prestigious scientific journals are regarded as top-performing employees in many R&D intensive firms. For example, IBM has its “IBM Fellows” award to celebrate the achievements of star performers and 3M honors its top scientists through their induction into the Carlton Society [ 30 ].…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, internal performance implications should not be neglected (Cattani, Ferriani, Mariani, & Mengoli, ; Datta & Guthrie, ; Groysberg & Lee, ; Groysberg, Lee, & Nanda, ; Groysberg, Polzer, & Elfenbein, ; Wade et al., ). Groysberg, Nanda, and Noria (), for example, argue that transferring superstars brings with it some obstacles and negative influences on operational team performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%