2014
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tackling the social cognition paradox through multi-scale approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results lend support to the idea that there is an imbalance between self and other neural dynamics, the other coming before the self (Graziano and Kastner, 2011). Taken together, the present findings call for going beyond the social brain per se to embrace a more integrative perspective where sensorimotor abilities and accurate intention attribution are part and parcel of the same self-organizing coordination dynamics that grounds social awareness and cognition (Oullier and Kelso, 2009;Kelso et al, 2013;Dumas et al, 2014b).…”
Section: Brain Dynamics Of Social Embodimentsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Our results lend support to the idea that there is an imbalance between self and other neural dynamics, the other coming before the self (Graziano and Kastner, 2011). Taken together, the present findings call for going beyond the social brain per se to embrace a more integrative perspective where sensorimotor abilities and accurate intention attribution are part and parcel of the same self-organizing coordination dynamics that grounds social awareness and cognition (Oullier and Kelso, 2009;Kelso et al, 2013;Dumas et al, 2014b).…”
Section: Brain Dynamics Of Social Embodimentsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Recently cognitive science has started to adopt a multi-scale and dynamical systems account for different aspects of human behavior (Dumas et al, 2014). Complexity sciences are a formal way for adopting such an approach, as they have the advantage of studying a wide variety of phenomena from both holistic and dynamic perspectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57,58 During development, this ability to infer intentions and attribute goals to others is intrinsically tied to motor cognition 59 , however, there seems to be a chicken-egg problem in what appears first: the ability to interact with others, or the ability to represent them. 60 Grossmann and others have provided evidence, contrary to the suggestion of James and Piaget, that infants are equipped from birth to preferentially direct their attention to and process social stimuli. 61 The emergence of meaning starts well before the emergence of language.…”
Section: Goal and Semantic Alignmentsmentioning
confidence: 87%