2015
DOI: 10.1177/1541931215591128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tactile Displays of Pulse Oximetry

Abstract: Prior investigations of vibrotactile displays suggest they have promise for use in the healthcare domain. This exploratory study forms part of a series exploring the use of an upper arm, continuously informing, vibrotactile display of pulse oximetry for clinicians. The study focused on the effect of vigilance on participants' accuracy and latency for detecting and identifying changes in vital sign levels. Twenty-one participants were tested in a within-subjects design in four blocks of approximately 18 minutes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tactile modality could provide continuous information about patients' vital signs to clinicians, supporting quicker detection and identification of true patient deterioration (Ferris & Sarter, 2011). Our previous research investigated whether a semi-continuous vibrotactile display of a patient's heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) would let participants identify changes in HR and SpO 2 with significantly greater than 90% accuracy (Fouhy, 2015;McLanders, Santomauro, Tran, & Sanderson, 2014;Shapiro, Santomauro, McLanders, Tran, & Sanderson, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tactile modality could provide continuous information about patients' vital signs to clinicians, supporting quicker detection and identification of true patient deterioration (Ferris & Sarter, 2011). Our previous research investigated whether a semi-continuous vibrotactile display of a patient's heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) would let participants identify changes in HR and SpO 2 with significantly greater than 90% accuracy (Fouhy, 2015;McLanders, Santomauro, Tran, & Sanderson, 2014;Shapiro, Santomauro, McLanders, Tran, & Sanderson, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%