Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3411764.3445578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tactile Fixations: A Behavioral Marker on How People with Visual Impairments Explore Raised-line Graphics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No different exploratory patterns were identified depending on the condition. Here we could corroborate the observations made by Zhao et al [16]. since finger on the seamarks were long even when participants were thinking about something else like scale conversion or cardinal orientation cogitation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No different exploratory patterns were identified depending on the condition. Here we could corroborate the observations made by Zhao et al [16]. since finger on the seamarks were long even when participants were thinking about something else like scale conversion or cardinal orientation cogitation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…During manual exploration, "tactile fixations", like eye fixations, have been observed. More precisely, when a finger stops on an element of a map, this draws specific attention to this element and its spatial relationships [16]. Therefore, one could surmise that vocal information should help VIPs to explore a spatial layout.…”
Section: Spatial Cognition and Tactile Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exploration of a document defines a promising scenario involving concurrent tasks. Indeed [76], in line with [33,60], showed that as a part of a cognitive strategy to interpret a tactile document, fingers frequently stop and go during the exploration. TTF µGestures could be a complementary input modality of choice as µGestures could be triggered on the fly during those stops and with minimal impact on the cognitive process of understanding the document.…”
Section: General Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Because they explore the document with their hands, integration of the content must be done more sequentially compared to a sighted user, by aggregating a succession of incomplete details until enough has been gained to synthesize and understand the whole picture [46]. When exploring audio-tactile documents, PVI rely on bimanual strategies mainly based on movements of the two index finger tips touching the tactile document [5,6,54,76]. But existing audio-tactile devices require back and forth movements between the document being explored and a command menu placed sideways, which interrupts exploration strategies and increases cognitive load [11].…”
Section: Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, to determine the threshold beyond which the gap between dots can make it difficult to perceive them as a line. These studies could also focus on both the recognition rate and the exploration strategies implemented [22]- [24]. Indeed, the spacing between the dots could influence the implementation of exploratory procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%