2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tactile response adaptation to whisker stimulation in the lemniscal somatosensory pathway of rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
6
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A prominent feature of sensory adaptation is that the degree of response attenuation is linked to the rate of sensory stimulation: higher frequency stimulation leads to stronger amplitude attenuation (Chung et al, 2002;Khatri et al, 2004;Kheradpezhouh., 2017;Martin-Cortecero & Nuñez, 2014). We find this common pattern in our V1, S1 and A1 responses (Fig.…”
Section: Response Attenuation With Stimulus Frequencysupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A prominent feature of sensory adaptation is that the degree of response attenuation is linked to the rate of sensory stimulation: higher frequency stimulation leads to stronger amplitude attenuation (Chung et al, 2002;Khatri et al, 2004;Kheradpezhouh., 2017;Martin-Cortecero & Nuñez, 2014). We find this common pattern in our V1, S1 and A1 responses (Fig.…”
Section: Response Attenuation With Stimulus Frequencysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This may differ by sensory system, as a recent study using fiber photometry failed to find a termination (or echo) response in the auditory thalamus (Li et al, 2017). Both the biphasic response to individual pulses (or low frequency stimulation) and response attenuation at high stimulus frequencies have also been reported subcortically (Chung et al, 2002;Funayama et al, 2016;Martin-Cortecero, J. & Nuñez, A., 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When the fatigue mechanisms revealed in the above in-vitro studies contribute to repetition suppression, one would expect that repetition suppression decreases when acetylcholine is augmented. In line with this hypothesis, local intracerebral application of acetylcholine has been reported to reduce but not abolish adaptation in anesthetized rodent colliculus inferior 14 and somatosensory (barrel) cortex 15 . In contrast to these studies in non-visual regions of rodents, a human fMRI study 16 showed increased repetition suppression in inferior occipital cortex for faces with systemic application of the cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine, and no region showed an attenuation of repetition suppression under physostigmine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Indeed, for both ACh 14,15 and GAB 18,19 , previous studies in rodents showed decreased stimulus selective adaptation. In these studies, repetition suppression was still present with drug application and it is unclear whether the smaller adaptation indices did not result from increased responses per se since raw instead of net responses were employed to compute adaptation indices (except for one control analysis in 14 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The 30‐ and 125‐ms delays were chosen because the somatosensory activation within the SI is assumed to persist for at least 60 ms (Allison et al ., ; Mauguière et al ., ) and its signal recovery time has been reported to be about 110 ms (Hamada et al ., ). Thus, in the 30‐ms condition the processing of both stimuli overlapped within the SI (Chung et al ., ; Martin‐Cortecero & Nuñez, ; Nakagawa et al ., ), whereas in the 125‐ms condition the first stimulus is processed by the SI before the second stimulus arrives and therefore the stimuli interact at later stages, most likely in the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) or the parietal cortex. The rationale behind these specific timings comes from the different retention times of the somatosensory signal in the SI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%