2013
DOI: 10.1080/02331888.2013.800520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tail asymptotic of Weibull-type risks

Abstract: With motivation from Arendarczyk and Dȩbicki (2011), in this paper we derive the tail asymptotics of the product of two dependent Weibull-type risks, which is of interest in various statistical and applied probability problems. Our results extend some recent findings of Schlueter and Fischer (2012) and Bose et al. (2012).

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the second inequality follows from Lemma 2.1 in [2] (see also Corollary 2.2 in [20]) and M, M ′ are positive constants. Clearly, for C > m we further have nP(∥δ n ∥ > C) → 0, n → ∞.…”
Section: Proofs Of Theorems 21 and 23mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…where the second inequality follows from Lemma 2.1 in [2] (see also Corollary 2.2 in [20]) and M, M ′ are positive constants. Clearly, for C > m we further have nP(∥δ n ∥ > C) → 0, n → ∞.…”
Section: Proofs Of Theorems 21 and 23mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For g 1 , g 2 being regularly varying and ultimately monotone [29] shows that a similar result to (1.7) is valid. In statement (b) of Theorem 2.1 we remove the assumption that g 1 and g 2 are ultimately monotone.…”
Section: Log-weibullian and Weibullian Risksmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The class of distribution functions satisfying (2.7) is quite large. More importantly, under (2.7) SX has also a Weibull tail behaviour if X is a N (0, 1) random variable independent of S, see e.g., [16]. We state next our second result for Weibull-type random scaling.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…where ρ ij and A ij are defined in (1.1). Note that for 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n and some positive constants c 1 , c 2 , using similar arguments as in the proof of Theorem 2.1 in [16], we have…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation