2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1568162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tail Return Analysis of Bear Stearns Credit Default Swaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, as 85% of the underlying assets in CDS contracts are 5-year bonds [7], it is surprising to note that the GARCH residuals for the bond sample appear to be iid, while the CDS sample GARCH residuals indicate evidence of nonlinear dependence. This may indicate that the source of the nonlinear dependence is particular to the CDS contract and does not relate to the assets underlying the contract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In conclusion, as 85% of the underlying assets in CDS contracts are 5-year bonds [7], it is surprising to note that the GARCH residuals for the bond sample appear to be iid, while the CDS sample GARCH residuals indicate evidence of nonlinear dependence. This may indicate that the source of the nonlinear dependence is particular to the CDS contract and does not relate to the assets underlying the contract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The results are mixed with some evidence of nonlinear dependencies remaining in the data. For an example of the analysis of the CDS GARCH residuals, see Li and Mizrach [7]. Li and Mizrach [7] apply a univariate model to CDS data using the GARCH model but do not test the residuals for iid characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation