2018
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(18)30048-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tailored frequency-escalated primary prophylaxis for severe haemophilia A: results of the 16-year Canadian Hemophilia Prophylaxis Study longitudinal cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could explain to some extent why, at the individual level, some boys over time manifested clinically significant joint disease as measured by MRI. We previously reported that end‐of‐study imaging outcomes were good overall but that some individuals had evidence of significant joint damage with individual joint scores on the 17‐point IPSG MRI scale as high as 14 (on this scale, a score of 17 indicates maximal damage per index joint) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This could explain to some extent why, at the individual level, some boys over time manifested clinically significant joint disease as measured by MRI. We previously reported that end‐of‐study imaging outcomes were good overall but that some individuals had evidence of significant joint damage with individual joint scores on the 17‐point IPSG MRI scale as high as 14 (on this scale, a score of 17 indicates maximal damage per index joint) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The CHPS was an inception cohort of 56 young boys with severe hemophilia A, defined by a circulating FVIII level of <2%. Detailed descriptions of the study design have been previously reported . For the current analysis, we assessed the factor infusion and bleeding logs of all 56 boys on study from 1997 to 2013.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…I typically initiate the discussion soon after diagnosis and recommend initiation prior to the first or second joint bleed. I discuss options of frequency‐escalated prophylaxis, starting once weekly via peripheral vein infusion, versus prophylaxis starting at 2–4 times week after central venous catheter placement. Once prophylaxis is initiated, the choice of factor product may be driven by individual pharmacokinetics, target trough level, and infusion frequency needed to achieve the target.…”
Section: Shared Decision‐making For Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%