2005
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tailoring the Active Site of Chemzymes by Using a Chemogenetic‐Optimization Procedure: Towards Substrate‐Specific Artificial Hydrogenases Based on the Biotin–Avidin Technology

Abstract: Dedicated to Professor George M. WhitesidesCatalysis offers efficient means to produce enantiopure products. Traditionally, enzymatic and homogeneous catalysis have evolved independently to afford mild, robust, active, and highly selective catalysts. [1, 2] Both systems are often considered complementary in terms of substrate and reaction scope, operating conditions, enantioselectivity mechanism, reaction medium, etc. For the optimization of activity and selectivity, directed-evolution methodologies (combined… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This chemo-genetic optimization scheme (a term initially coined by Distefano [13] ) allows the rapid generation of substrate-specific and either (R)-or (S)-selective artificial metalloenzymes (Table 1). [26] These results highlight the versatility of the chemogenetic optimization scheme. The natures of the spacer, the ligand, and the aminoacid residue at position 112, identified as a close-lying residue (Table 1, entry 2), all work in concert to afford either (R)-or (S)-selective catalysts (up to 94 % ee (R), Table 1, entries 1, 3 and 9; up to 88 % ee (S), Table 1, entries 4-7).…”
Section: Supramolecular Anchoring Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This chemo-genetic optimization scheme (a term initially coined by Distefano [13] ) allows the rapid generation of substrate-specific and either (R)-or (S)-selective artificial metalloenzymes (Table 1). [26] These results highlight the versatility of the chemogenetic optimization scheme. The natures of the spacer, the ligand, and the aminoacid residue at position 112, identified as a close-lying residue (Table 1, entry 2), all work in concert to afford either (R)-or (S)-selective catalysts (up to 94 % ee (R), Table 1, entries 1, 3 and 9; up to 88 % ee (S), Table 1, entries 4-7).…”
Section: Supramolecular Anchoring Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…[21][22][23][24] βGAL was chosen as donor mainly because of its strong fluorescence emission from abundant Trp residues at UV excitation. It is an enzyme containing 156 Trp residues and is widely distributed in microorganisms, animals and plants.…”
Section: 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] In most cases, the chemical optimization such as using a conformationally rigid biotin spacer containing enantiopure amino acids [9,11] has a larger impact on the performance of the hybrid catalyst than exchange of an amino acid of the protein.…”
Section: Artificial Metalloenzymes: Enantioselective Catalysis and Bementioning
confidence: 99%