2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tailoring the crack-bridging behavior of strain-hardening cement-based composites (SHCC) by chemical surface modification of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) fibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found for several fibers that the mechanical interlocking led to plastic deformations of the surface, stretching of the fiber and therefore improved energy absorption during SFPO ( Figure 9 ). In the literature, similar damage and stretching effects due to high surface roughness were reported for UHMWPE fibers [ 14 , 38 ], and in combination with an additional good chemical adhesion to the matrix material for PVA fibers [ 54 , 55 ]. Since the AFM analysis, as shown in Figure 5 , Table 4 revealed comparable roughness between the C20 and C20− fibers, the fibers mainly differ in their drawing ratio; so, the higher force level for C20 fibers during pull-out can be traced back to their higher Young’s modulus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…It was found for several fibers that the mechanical interlocking led to plastic deformations of the surface, stretching of the fiber and therefore improved energy absorption during SFPO ( Figure 9 ). In the literature, similar damage and stretching effects due to high surface roughness were reported for UHMWPE fibers [ 14 , 38 ], and in combination with an additional good chemical adhesion to the matrix material for PVA fibers [ 54 , 55 ]. Since the AFM analysis, as shown in Figure 5 , Table 4 revealed comparable roughness between the C20 and C20− fibers, the fibers mainly differ in their drawing ratio; so, the higher force level for C20 fibers during pull-out can be traced back to their higher Young’s modulus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The fiber’s surface roughness is increased after modification, and dense hydration products are produced around the fiber’s surface so that the chemical bonding and strength of the fiber and the cement-based interface are improved. Curosu et al [ 16 , 17 ] treated GFRP and PVA fibers with sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid, respectively. Compared with sulfuric acid, the hydrochloric acid modification balances the fiber and the matrix’s adhesion, making the fiber cement-based material possess prominent superior mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for exploiting the maximum benefits of using fibers, all these factors must be considered and incorporated carefully in the concrete material and structural design. Some benefits of using different types of FRC are depicted in Figure 1 [6][7][8][9]. Compared to normal concrete (NC) and FRC, the remarkable material properties of UHPFRC lead to high tensile strain and strength capacities and the development of a pseudo-plastic phase (strain hardening) prior to concrete softening, which is responsible to high energy absorption (toughness) before fracturing [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiber reinforced concretes of different types have been successfully used as repair materials in several real-life projects including bridge decks, concrete dams, tunnels, coupling beams in high-rise buildings, in the USA, Japan, and Germany [26,27]. [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation