“…Due to their excellent advantages like complete mineralization of pollutants, no requirement for the disposal of sludge, and low energy consumption, several photocatalytic degradation techniques with dispersive nanostructured catalyst or substrate-supported nanostructured catalyst or catalyst-coated macroscale channel, or nanostructured catalyst-based microfluidic reactor have been put forward to carbonize relevant organic species in wastewater. Of all these photocatalytic degradation techniques, the nanostructured catalyst-based microfluidic reactor has been more often used thanks to its large surface-to-volume ratio, short diffusion distance and rapid mass transport process of molecules from an aqueous solution to catalysts, high illumination homogeneity, and accurate irradiation on nanostructured catalysts, no need of postseparation and recovery which are common for suspended catalysts, and 2 orders of magnitude higher photocatalytic efficiency. − The nanostructured catalysts mainly include metal oxide or sulfide semiconductors (that is, BiVO 4 , ZnO, , TiO 2 , , ZnS, and WO 3 ), noble metal-doped metal oxide semiconductors − (for instance, Ag/ZnO, Ga/ZnO, and Au/ZnO), and surface-sensitized metal oxide semiconductors (namely, C 60 /ZnO, Graphene/ZnO, and CuO/ZnO). Owing to the unique structure of the p-n heterojunction and the effectual inhibition of the combination of photogenerated electrons and holes, the nanostructured CuO/ZnONRs have excellent photodegradation performance and thus have been widely employed to construct various microfluidic reactors. − In regard to the evaluation of the photodegradation performance of these nanostructured catalyst-based microfluidic reactors, the experimental and numerical routes and eq have been invariably used in the literature, − where K A (min –1 ) is initial rate constant, K a (min –1 ) is kinetic adsorption rate constant, and K Lev (min –1 ) is mass transport-controlled constant.…”