2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2018.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tailoring the pressure drop and fluid distribution of a capacitive deionization device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the surface zeta potential and ion adsorption capacity of ACC were observed to be directly proportional to the applied DC voltage ( Figure 2 and insert). This provides a plausible justification to operate the CDI unit at the upper potential limit of 1.6 V DC , wherein we have previously observed good ion removal capacity (Laxman et al, 2015a , 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, the surface zeta potential and ion adsorption capacity of ACC were observed to be directly proportional to the applied DC voltage ( Figure 2 and insert). This provides a plausible justification to operate the CDI unit at the upper potential limit of 1.6 V DC , wherein we have previously observed good ion removal capacity (Laxman et al, 2015a , 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Following similar principles, the negative charge on the Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial cell wall mediates their adsorption onto the positively charged electrode surface through electrosorption processes, thus removing the microbes from the treated water (Laxman et al, 2015a ; Wang et al, 2018 ; Yasin et al, 2018 ). The inter-electrode electric field magnitude and the total surface area of the electrodes available for electrosorption are important in determining the charged species removal efficacy of CDI devices (Laxman et al, 2015b , 2019 ). While CDI systems have been well-studied for removing a variety of ionic contaminants from water, the dynamics of microbial removal, especially in the presence of ionic species has not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CDI devices, highly porous electrodes with high surface area are used for maximum adsorption sites for the ions. Let us consider a piece of porous material thoroughly soaked with saltwater [21][22][23] (Figure 2). Now, activated carbon cloth (ACC) is a popular choice of electrode material [23][24][25].…”
Section: The Physics Behind the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the porous electrode leads the salt ions from water to adsorb on either of the electrode surfaces depending on their electrical charge. [23] Thus, the device composition and operational parameters strongly affect the CDI process, including the electrode material, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] electrode surface modifications, [27,35] cell architecture, [36][37][38][39] waterelectrolyte composition, [40][41][42][43][44][45][46] applied voltage, [47][48][49] and flowrate of water passed through the devices. [30,37,[50][51][52] Thus, modeling such processes is important to understand and predict the deionization characteristics in CDI operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 23 ] Thus, the device composition and operational parameters strongly affect the CDI process, including the electrode material, [ 24–34 ] electrode surface modifications, [ 27,35 ] cell architecture, [ 36–39 ] water‐electrolyte composition, [ 40–46 ] applied voltage, [ 47–49 ] and flowrate of water passed through the devices. [ 30,37,50–52 ] Thus, modeling such processes is important to understand and predict the deionization characteristics in CDI operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%