2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/4596782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Takagi‐Sugeno Fuzzy Modeling and PSO‐Based Robust LQR Anti‐Swing Control for Overhead Crane

Abstract: The dynamic model of overhead crane is highly nonlinear and uncertain. In this paper, Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy modeling and PSO-based robust linear quadratic regulator (LQR) are proposed for anti-swing and positioning control of the system. First, on the basis of sector nonlinear theory, the two T-S fuzzy models are established by using the virtual control variables and approximate method. Then, considering the uncertainty of the model, robust LQR controllers with parallel distributed compensation (PDC) struc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The researchers in [5], developed a combination of PID-PI controller for the crane system to minimize the pendulum-like settings which caused many difficulties and dangerous conditions with new performance criterion function that used to tune the PID-PD controller using PSO algorithm. X. Shao et al [6], proposed a Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy modeling and robust Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) based PSO algorithm for positioning and anti-swing control for the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers in [5], developed a combination of PID-PI controller for the crane system to minimize the pendulum-like settings which caused many difficulties and dangerous conditions with new performance criterion function that used to tune the PID-PD controller using PSO algorithm. X. Shao et al [6], proposed a Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy modeling and robust Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) based PSO algorithm for positioning and anti-swing control for the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback of these open-loop techniques is that they cannot cope with various external disturbances that exist in the actual operational environment. Hence, closed-loop control techniques such as proportional integral derivative (PID) and its invariants, 1416 model predictive control (MPC), 1719 sliding mode control (SMC), 2022 adaptive control, 2325 intelligent control 14,26,27 and instantaneous optimal control, 28 are more practical. Input saturation, as well as constraints on trolley velocity and sway angles for safety consideration, 9,19,29 are well-considered in the above controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in general, the open-loop control system can not guarantee the good performance in the case of system uncertainties and external disturbances. Therefore, many closed-loop control techniques are applied to the overhead crane system to improve the performance such as nonlinear feedback [7][8][9][10][11], partial feedback linearization [12,13], fuzzy logic control [14][15][16][17], sliding mode control [18][19][20][21] and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%