It has become a truism to observe that the world faces a "water crisis." 1 Since the early 1990s, scientists and commentators have studied and debated the myriad socioeconomic, geopolitical, and ecological problems that have contributed to, and will result from, our state of "peak water." Already in some parts of the world, water consumption exceeds the amount of water that is naturally replenished each year. 2 According to the 2009 edition of The World's Water, nearly two out of three people in the world could be living under conditions of water stress in the year 2025. 3 This frightening situation, which has resulted from the (mis)management of the world's waterways, looks set to worsen over the decades ahead as climate change and other pressures take their toll. Governments, activists, and scholars have produced many potential solutions to the world's water crisis. Activist Maude Barlow in her important book The Blue Covenant argues for a global covenant on water that is centered on the premise of the inalienable human right to clean water. Under this covenant, people and their governments would protect and conserve the world's water supplies, ensure water for those in both the global North and the global South, and seek the peaceful resolution of disputes regarding water between states. 4 Scientists Meena Palaniappan and Peter H. Gleick advocate a "soft path for water," which combines water resource management with an emphasis on efficiency, productivity, equity, and community participation. 5 Others, meanwhile, have advised governments to leave the problem