2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00712-010-0116-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Takeovers and cooperatives: governance and stability in non-corporate firms

Abstract: If consumers wholly or partially control a …rm with market power they will charge less than the pro…t maximizing price. Starting at the usual monopoly price, a small price reduction will have a second order e¤ect on pro…ts but a …rst order e¤ect on consumer surplus. Despite this desirable static result, it has been argued that cooperatives are vulnerable to take-over by outsiders who will run them as for-pro…t businesses. This paper studies takeovers of cooperatives. We argue that there will not be excessive t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, for this type of cooperative, the average cost pricing rule , widely known in the literature on consumer cooperatives (Helmberger and Hoos , Anderson et al , Ireland and Law ), also holds under mixed oligopoly. This depends on the fact that, whereas a price reduction has a second‐order effect on the shares of profit of individual consumers, it has a first‐order effect on their surplus (see also Kelsey and Milne , , Marini and Zevi ). However, we show now that this result does not necessarily hold if each cooperative acts coordinately to maximize the joint utilities of all consumers (see also Enke () and Farrell () for the monopoly case).…”
Section: The Decentralized Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, for this type of cooperative, the average cost pricing rule , widely known in the literature on consumer cooperatives (Helmberger and Hoos , Anderson et al , Ireland and Law ), also holds under mixed oligopoly. This depends on the fact that, whereas a price reduction has a second‐order effect on the shares of profit of individual consumers, it has a first‐order effect on their surplus (see also Kelsey and Milne , , Marini and Zevi ). However, we show now that this result does not necessarily hold if each cooperative acts coordinately to maximize the joint utilities of all consumers (see also Enke () and Farrell () for the monopoly case).…”
Section: The Decentralized Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the published academic research on co-operatives, particularly in the last few years, has been economic in orientation, discussing finance, governance and control (see Cremer, 2009;Kelsey and Milne, 2010;Siebert and Lyford, 2009;Valentinov, 2007), much of it focused on agricultural co-operatives or very large co-operatives such as Mondragon in Spain (e.g. Lopez et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%