2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.173455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Takeovers: Their Causes and Consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
134
0
19

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
10
134
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…The independent variables and the empirical estimation are consistent with the existing literature (Jensen, 1988). The existing literature predicts that the probability of a takeover is negatively related to ROA, R&D/Sales, TL/TA (Total liabilities/Total assets) and Log (TA).…”
Section: Variables Specificationsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The independent variables and the empirical estimation are consistent with the existing literature (Jensen, 1988). The existing literature predicts that the probability of a takeover is negatively related to ROA, R&D/Sales, TL/TA (Total liabilities/Total assets) and Log (TA).…”
Section: Variables Specificationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Consistent with existing research (Jensen, 1988), both hypotheses predict that takeovers and internal events occur because a firm's performance is unprofitable (b5 < 0) and volatile (b6 < 0; b9 > 0). Also, Jensen (1988) reported that, in general, insider ownership (b4 < 0) is negatively related to both takeovers and internal control contests. Jensen further notes that outside director percentage was both positively and negatively related to takeovers (b3 > 0) and internal control contests (b3 < 0), respectively.…”
Section: Variables Specificationsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…They suggest that M&As between rival firms lead to an overall reduction of R&D efforts, while they predict the opposite when the merged entities are technologically complementary. 6 M&As can also be an instrument to correct for managerial inefficiencies and weak corporate governance mechanisms (Jensen, 1988;Jensen and Ruback, 1983). Improved management practices and the rationalization of unprofitable projects -possibly including R&D efforts -can increase firm value and gains on the stock market can be realized.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This perspective is based on the presumption that managers of publicly held firms usually attempt to maximize stockholder wealth with a vigorous ''market for corporate control'' as the primary control mechanism (Jensen, 1988).…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%