2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-015-0710-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking a ‘Big Data’ approach to data quality in a citizen science project

Abstract: Data from well-designed experiments provide the strongest evidence of causation in biodiversity studies. However, for many species the collection of these data is not scalable to the spatial and temporal extents required to understand patterns at the population level. Only data collected from citizen science projects can gather sufficient quantities of data, but data collected from volunteers are inherently noisy and heterogeneous. Here we describe a ‘Big Data’ approach to improve the data quality in eBird, a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
132
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
132
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is only a narrow collaboration, which may not be very successful in a Big Data era (Kelling et al, 2015).…”
Section: Expanding Professional Collaboration To Citizen Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is only a narrow collaboration, which may not be very successful in a Big Data era (Kelling et al, 2015).…”
Section: Expanding Professional Collaboration To Citizen Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First is the authenticity of (big) data collecting method, which is rather opportunistic than scientific [17][18][19]. This factor may significantly affect representativeness of data sample being used for analysis.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [43] Hossain, et al dynamically assess three quality attributes for the detection and identification of human presence in multimedia monitoring systems, where-as Rodríguez and Riveill [44] present data quality in relation to e-Health monitoring systems. Crowd-sourced citizen science [45] and volunteered geographic information [46][47][48] efforts attract data quality research for obvious reasons. When the public assists in collecting data, the benefits of public collection must be weighed against the potential for poor quality submissions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%