2016
DOI: 10.1515/jolace-2016-0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking a literature circles approach to teach Academic English

Abstract: Literature circles (LC), an activity framework for classroom discussion, has been adapted for EFL classes to help students engage more deeply with reading texts. In this approach, students read texts outside of class, and discuss the texts in class, using a specified discussion framework. Originally developed for L1 classes as a tool for teaching literature, LC has been adapted for EFL classes, not only to help develop reading skills, but also to help students develop their discussion skills. However, to date,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, instructors at a co-educational secondary school in Hong Kong, reflecting on the use of RC in English reading lessons, claimed that they resulted in meaningful outcomes: (a) teacher-student interactions, (b) livelier lessons, (c) peers helping peers learn, (d) well-elaborated ideas by pupils, (e) critical readers, and (f) students’ willingness to speak in English (Chui, 2013). Graham-Marr and Pellowe (2016) examined Japanese university EMI engineering students’ perceptions of using RC with non-fiction materials. Students in the study said that among the four RC roles, the role of summarizer was the most difficult (90% of study participants), claiming that while they understood the content, it was difficult to summarize the text in their own words.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, instructors at a co-educational secondary school in Hong Kong, reflecting on the use of RC in English reading lessons, claimed that they resulted in meaningful outcomes: (a) teacher-student interactions, (b) livelier lessons, (c) peers helping peers learn, (d) well-elaborated ideas by pupils, (e) critical readers, and (f) students’ willingness to speak in English (Chui, 2013). Graham-Marr and Pellowe (2016) examined Japanese university EMI engineering students’ perceptions of using RC with non-fiction materials. Students in the study said that among the four RC roles, the role of summarizer was the most difficult (90% of study participants), claiming that while they understood the content, it was difficult to summarize the text in their own words.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%