2000
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2000.3.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking a Spiritual History Allows Clinicians to Understand Patients More Fully

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
299
0
34

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 597 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
299
0
34
Order By: Relevance
“…We recommend handling religious coping with sensitivity, initiating conversation with each patient to determine whether the patient engages in religious coping or perceives personal spiritual needs. Health professionals should review published guidelines for assessing patients' spirituality [100]. In cases where religious coping is clearly relevant for the patient, one may encourage the patient's use of positive religious coping techniques, such as interacting with a faith community or participating in private religious activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recommend handling religious coping with sensitivity, initiating conversation with each patient to determine whether the patient engages in religious coping or perceives personal spiritual needs. Health professionals should review published guidelines for assessing patients' spirituality [100]. In cases where religious coping is clearly relevant for the patient, one may encourage the patient's use of positive religious coping techniques, such as interacting with a faith community or participating in private religious activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most agreed-upon application of R/S into clinical practice was the need to obtain a spiritual history (SH). 6,35,36 The SH explores the importance and practical implications of R/S in patients' lives as it applies to their illnesses.…”
Section: Assessing R/s In Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 The FICA (faith, importance, community and address), which obtained the highest score (covering 13 items), is a brief measure that takes only 5 minutes to administer and is useful both in general and in psychiatric practice when shortage of time is an issue. 35 The other highly ranked instruments were SPIRITual History 40 and FAITH 41 (covering 12 items) and HOPE 42 and the Royal College of Psychiatrists Assessment 38 (covering 11 items) (Box 1). The latter measure is the only instrument directed specifically for mental health and takes 20-25 minutes to complete.…”
Section: Assessing R/s In Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there is little consensus on how to define or measure religiosity and spirituality in an objective manner, it was decided to rely on self-perception regarding an individual's religiosity and spirituality [40]. Each respondent was asked to rate their religiosity or spirituality on a four-point Likert scale, with 1 being the response if the individual considered him/herself very spiritual or religious and 4 the response if the individual considered him/herself to be nonreligious or nonspiritual (Appendix 1).…”
Section: Survey Designmentioning
confidence: 99%