Taking Chances: The Effect of Growing Up on Welfare on the Risky Behavior of Young People

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SIZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. We analyze the effect of growing up on welfare on young people's involvement in a variety of social and health risks. Young people in welfare families are much more likely to take both social and health risks. Much of the apparent link between family welfare history and risk taking disappears, however, once we account for family structure and mothers' decisions regarding their own risk taking and investment in their children. Interestingly, we find no significant effect of socio-economic status per se. Overall, we find no evidence that growing up on welfare causes young people to engage in risky behavior.JEL Classification: J13, I38, J18

Cognitive Skills, Gender and Risk Preferences

“…The YIF Project uses Australian administrative social security records to identify all young people born between October 1987 and March 1988 who appeared in the Centrelink administrative data between 1991 and July 2006 (Breunig et al ., ; Cobb‐Clark et al ., ) . A comparison of the number of young adults in these administrative data with census data reveals that over 98 per cent of all young people born between October 1987 and March 1988 are represented in the administrative data (Breunig et al ., ).…”

‘High’‐School: The Relationship between Early Marijuana Use and Educational Outcomes

“…The Australian government does not consider either the Family Tax Benefit or the Child Care Benefit to be income support payments, and we adopt this convention here. We also follow Cobb-Clark et al (2012) in creating four indicators of socio-economic disad-vantage based on the intensity and timing of income support receipt: (i) no history of income support; (ii) less than 6 years of income support after 1998 when the respondent was aged 10 or more (late moderate income support receipt); (iii) less than 6 years of income support, some of which occurred before 1998 when the respondent was younger than 10 (early moderate income support receipt); and (iv) more than 6 years of income support receipt (intense income support receipt).…”

Is there an educational penalty for being suspended from school?

“…But as in Cobb-Clark et al (2012), here we are particularly interested in a proxy for disadvantage based on family welfare-receipt history, which categorizes families as follows:…”