2013
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking note of Tinbergen, or: the promise of a biology of behaviour

Abstract: In this concluding paper, we revisit Tinbergen's 1963 article and assess its impact on the field of behavioural research in general, and the papers in this volume in particular. We show how Tinbergen's insistence that greater attention should be paid to studies of ‘survival value’ has yielded immense returns over the past 50 years, allowing an integrative biology of behaviour to emerge and thrive, and that his addition of ontogeny to the ‘major problems of biology’ was both insightful and prescient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crucial concepts addressed by such studies include the roles of kinship and inclusive fitness in shaping social interactions, as well as the effects of specific ecological parameters on social structure [8,22]. Such studies have the advantage of documenting patterns of behavior and the associated adaptive consequences in the environments, and under the selective regimes experienced by the study organisms.…”
Section: Ecological and Evolutionary Traditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crucial concepts addressed by such studies include the roles of kinship and inclusive fitness in shaping social interactions, as well as the effects of specific ecological parameters on social structure [8,22]. Such studies have the advantage of documenting patterns of behavior and the associated adaptive consequences in the environments, and under the selective regimes experienced by the study organisms.…”
Section: Ecological and Evolutionary Traditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only now, 50 years after Tinbergen's seminal 1963 publication [8], efforts to integrate neural, genetic, epigenetic, physiological, ecological, and evolutionary studies of behavior are gaining increased prominence [7,[9][10][11]101], facilitated by multiple factors, including innovative technologies (e.g., high-throughput sequencing [12]), and analytical procedures (e.g., improved statistical methods for modeling and comparative analyses [13]) as well as the increasing ease of application of these advances to field studies (e.g., biotelemetry [14,15]). As a result, it is increasingly possible to address all four of Tinbergen's questions concurrently for the same species [3,7,10,11,16], which is most effective when using modern comparative methods [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethological perspectives emphasize the importance of studying the neurobiology of parenting in its natural habitat and of using a behavior-based approach to test parents' brain adaptation to ecological pressures (22). Consistent with findings in other mammals (10), studies on brain-behavior associations in human mothers describe links between mother-infant synchrony and brain activation in the mother's subcortical regions, including the amygdala, nucleus accumebens, and hippocampus (11,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…By emphasizing the value and necessity of applying such an integrative approach to the study of flexibility in social behaviour, we hope to inspire behavioural and evolutionary biologists to adopt this more integrative perspective themselves [13] and also encourage more dialogue between field and laboratory scientists. The 50th anniversary of Tinbergen's influential publication provides a timely occasion for such encouragement, thanks to the recent methodological progress in genetics, developmental biology, neurobiology and molecular physiology that have made it possible to identify the interdependencies between ultimate and proximate determinants of behaviour in unprecedented detail, as well as a juncture to also acknowledging the influence of Julian Huxley, D'Arcy Thompson and others on Tinbergen's thinking [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%