The Experiential Library 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100775-4.00004-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking the Class Out of the Classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Library engagement in SL lags behind participation at institutional level, with many early examples limited to learning experiences on campus for librarianship students. Later literature shows librarians collaborating with faculty on SL courses in other disciplines and also initiating stand-alone library/literacy courses in collaboration with community partners (Blodgett 2017;Marrall 2014;Sweet 2013;Nutefall 2016). Proponents of SL point to evident synergies with both traditional library values (democracy, diversity, lifelong learning, public good, service, social responsibility) and current professional concerns, such as critical thinking and social justice education; but they also acknowledge the impact of SL on library practice in IL, collection development, reference work, institutional repositories, exhibition content and collaboration spaces, in facilitating access to a wider range of resources and facilities for students, faculty and community partners (Branch, Nutefall & Gruber 2020;Nutefall et al 2021;Yates 2014).…”
Section: Communities and Citizensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Library engagement in SL lags behind participation at institutional level, with many early examples limited to learning experiences on campus for librarianship students. Later literature shows librarians collaborating with faculty on SL courses in other disciplines and also initiating stand-alone library/literacy courses in collaboration with community partners (Blodgett 2017;Marrall 2014;Sweet 2013;Nutefall 2016). Proponents of SL point to evident synergies with both traditional library values (democracy, diversity, lifelong learning, public good, service, social responsibility) and current professional concerns, such as critical thinking and social justice education; but they also acknowledge the impact of SL on library practice in IL, collection development, reference work, institutional repositories, exhibition content and collaboration spaces, in facilitating access to a wider range of resources and facilities for students, faculty and community partners (Branch, Nutefall & Gruber 2020;Nutefall et al 2021;Yates 2014).…”
Section: Communities and Citizensmentioning
confidence: 99%