2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1400029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking the Direct Route - The Irish Supreme Court Decisions in Crotty, Coughlan and McKenna (No. 2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the referendum campaign for the European Fiscal Compact Treaty ongoing, interviewees were frequently scathing in their criticism of what was widely perceived as unwelcome and unhelpful external interference arising from the Irish legal context shaping the organisation and discursive mediation of competing sides in referendum campaigns. Particular ire was reserved for the implications of the Irish Supreme Court’s ruling in the 1998 Coughlan v. Broadcasting Complaints Commission case which was seen as forcing RTÉ to grant equal broadcast airtime to those campaigning for and against constitutional amendments (see Barrett, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the referendum campaign for the European Fiscal Compact Treaty ongoing, interviewees were frequently scathing in their criticism of what was widely perceived as unwelcome and unhelpful external interference arising from the Irish legal context shaping the organisation and discursive mediation of competing sides in referendum campaigns. Particular ire was reserved for the implications of the Irish Supreme Court’s ruling in the 1998 Coughlan v. Broadcasting Complaints Commission case which was seen as forcing RTÉ to grant equal broadcast airtime to those campaigning for and against constitutional amendments (see Barrett, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%