Taking the time for range testing: an approach to account for temporal resolution in acoustic telemetry detection range assessments

Abstract

Background In acoustic telemetry studies, detection range is usually evaluated as the relationship between the probability of detecting an individual transmission and the distance between the transmitter and receiver. When investigating animal presence, however, few detections will suffice to establish an animal’s presence within a certain time frame. In this study, we assess detection range and its impacting factors with a novel approach aimed towards studies making use of binary presence/absence metrics. The probability of determining presence of an acoustic transmitter within a certain time frame is calculated as the probability of detecting a set minimum number of transmissions within that time frame. We illustrate this method for hourly and daily time bins with an extensive empirical dataset of sentinel transmissions and detections in a receiver array in a Belgian offshore wind farm. Results The accuracy and specificity of over 84% for both temporal resolutions showed the developed approach performs adequately. Using this approach, we found important differences in the predictive performance of distinct hypothetical range testing scenarios. Finally, our results demonstrated that the probability of determining presence over distance to a receiver did not solely depend on environmental and technical conditions, but would also relate to the temporal resolution of the analysis, the programmed transmitting interval and the movement behaviour of the tagged animal. The probability of determining presence differed distinctly from a single transmission’s detectability, with an increase of up to 266 m for the estimated distance at 50% detection probability (D50). Conclusion When few detections of multiple transmissions suffice to ascertain presence within a time bin, predicted range differs distinctly from the probability of detecting a single transmission within that time bin. We recommend the use of more rigorous range testing methodologies for acoustic telemetry applications where the assessment of detection range is an integral part of the study design, the data analysis and the interpretation of results.

Elucidating the migrations of European seabass from the southern north sea using mark-recapture data, acoustic telemetry and data storage tags

“…For the acoustic tags (including ADST), the tag ID and sensor information were transmitted (69 kHz, MAP114, protocol A69-9006) to acoustic receivers (VR2W, VR2AR and VR2Tx; Innovasea Ltd., USA) of permanent and temporary networks in the study area 45,47 . From previous range testing in the BPNS, the median detection range distance (with 50% probability of observing the presence of a tagged seabass within a day's time) was estimated at 566 m 48 . Acoustic data and metadata was managed through the online database of the European Tracking Network (ETN; https:// lifew atch.…”

Acoustic and archival technologies join forces: A combination tag

“…Acoustic detections could be registered on the permanent Belgian acoustic receiver network (Reubens et al, 2019), with the detection range distance (where the probability of detecting a tagged animal within a day exceeded 0.5) averaging from 500 to 700 m (Goossens et al, 2022). The data management was facilitated through the European Tracking Network (ETN) database (https://lifew atch.be/ etn) (Reubens et al, 2019), archiving the data and metadata for both the acoustic and logged data.…”

Finding navigation cues near fishways

“…Positioning accuracy and detection probability is dependent on multiple variables. For example, the distance to the receiver has a large effect on detection probability (Babin et al ., 2019; Goossens et al ., 2022). Tag detection range also depends on multiple parameters such as emission type (Gilroy et al ., 2010; Leander et al ., 2020), and turbulence (Thorstad et al ., 2000).…”