2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking time to be healthy: Predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

32
311
1
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
32
311
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings are less consistent with their alternative buffering hypothesis, according to which concern with future consequences should be the best predictor of self-control (i.e., a concern with future consequences should buffer a person against self-control failure). Daugherty and Brase (2010) also measured the relation between delay discounting (measured with the Monetary Choice Questionnaire; Kirby, Petry, & Bickel, 1999) and time perspective (measured with the ZTPI and CFC scales). Like Joireman et al (2008), they found significant but small correlations (all rs < .2) between delay discounting and all measures of time perspective.…”
Section: Measures and Conceptualizations Of Delay Discounting And Futmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings are less consistent with their alternative buffering hypothesis, according to which concern with future consequences should be the best predictor of self-control (i.e., a concern with future consequences should buffer a person against self-control failure). Daugherty and Brase (2010) also measured the relation between delay discounting (measured with the Monetary Choice Questionnaire; Kirby, Petry, & Bickel, 1999) and time perspective (measured with the ZTPI and CFC scales). Like Joireman et al (2008), they found significant but small correlations (all rs < .2) between delay discounting and all measures of time perspective.…”
Section: Measures and Conceptualizations Of Delay Discounting And Futmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though time perspective and delay discounting appear similar, they are not overlapping constructs (Daugherty and Brase 2010). Despite the conceptual similarities, the few studies attempting to compare future time perspective and delay discounting do not give reason to suppose a robust relation between them (Teuscher and Mitchell 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite the conceptual similarities, the few studies attempting to compare future time perspective and delay discounting do not give reason to suppose a robust relation between them (Teuscher and Mitchell 2011). In particular, Joireman and colleagues (2008) found a positive correlation between delay discounting and the Immediate subscale of the CFC, and a negative association between delay discounting and scores on the CFC Future scale (for similar results, see Daugherty and Brase [2010]). Finally, Steinberg et al (2009) found a significant but modest positive correlation between delay discounting and future orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, extreme patterns of temporal biases might negatively affect health-related behaviors. For example, individuals who are strongly biased toward the present might not consider the future consequences of their acts by decreasing risk perception of behaviors such as smoking, substance use, or physical inactivity (e.g., Adams & Nettle, 2009;Apostolidis, Fieulaine, Simonin, & Rolland, 2006;Boyd & Zimbardo, 2005;Daugherty & Brase, 2010). The relevance of a biased TP in abnormal psychological functioning has also been suggested by several authors indicating that TP could be considered a core feature of some psychiatric disorders such as depression and suicidal ideation (Laghi, Baiocco, D'Alessio, & Gurrieri, 2009;van Beek, Berghuis, Kerkhof, & Beekman, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%