2018
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking turns: bridging the gap between human and animal communication

Abstract: Language, humans’ most distinctive trait, still remains a ‘mystery’ for evolutionary theory. It is underpinned by a universal infrastructure—cooperative turn-taking—which has been suggested as an ancient mechanism bridging the existing gap between the articulate human species and their inarticulate primate cousins. However, we know remarkably little about turn-taking systems of non-human animals, and methodological confounds have often prevented meaningful cross-species comparisons. Thus, the extent to which c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
216
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(244 reference statements)
2
216
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by these authors in their studies of parent-child relationships, this reciprocal interaction is a characteristic of attachment (18, 19), and the same may be true in child-pet relationships. Turn-taking of this sort forms a basis for communication, one in which conversational interchange becomes possible (20). Recent studies of human-cat relationships have emphasized that both the cat and the human affect and contribute to the relationship and bond involved (21, 22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by these authors in their studies of parent-child relationships, this reciprocal interaction is a characteristic of attachment (18, 19), and the same may be true in child-pet relationships. Turn-taking of this sort forms a basis for communication, one in which conversational interchange becomes possible (20). Recent studies of human-cat relationships have emphasized that both the cat and the human affect and contribute to the relationship and bond involved (21, 22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turn‐taking can be defined as “the orderly exchange of purely communicative signals or behaviors (e.g. peek‐a‐boo games in humans) between individuals characterized by principles for the coordination of turn transfer, which result in observable temporal regularities” (see also Tables and ). Animal chorusing can be defined as “Acoustic signalling produced collectively by a group of individuals whose activity is clustered in both space and time; choruses may be temporally structured in alternating or synchronous formats” (see also Table ).…”
Section: Chorusing Versus Turn‐taking: What Is the Difference?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, noncooperative coordination and competition often drive animal interactive displays . We illustrate these points by discussing and building upon some recent experiments and reviews of turn‐taking in nonhuman animals . Our intention, we stress, is not to criticize a related field or a particular paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations