2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Talent — Innate or acquired? Theoretical considerations and their implications for talent management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
219
2
29

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
4
219
2
29
Order By: Relevance
“…This perspective focuses on high-performing or high-potential employees, with the selection and identification of these exclusive employees raising ethical questions concerning hidden biases and workforce homogeneity. Second, the innate versus acquired perspective centers on the extent to which talent can be taught or learned (Dries 2013;Meyers et al 2013). The innate perspective concentrates on the identification and selection of 'talented' employees, an exclusive perspective that resonates with our focus on exclusive TM, and with hidden bias in terms of talent recognition in organizations.…”
Section: Talent Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This perspective focuses on high-performing or high-potential employees, with the selection and identification of these exclusive employees raising ethical questions concerning hidden biases and workforce homogeneity. Second, the innate versus acquired perspective centers on the extent to which talent can be taught or learned (Dries 2013;Meyers et al 2013). The innate perspective concentrates on the identification and selection of 'talented' employees, an exclusive perspective that resonates with our focus on exclusive TM, and with hidden bias in terms of talent recognition in organizations.…”
Section: Talent Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, TM should create a clear employee value proposition that is consistent with an explicit brand identity and focused on the long-term career development opportunities of their talent (Stahl et al, 2012). Diverse bundles of TM practices within an MNE context serve as 'acclimatization tools' and include career portfolio building, mechanisms that facilitate job rotation, as well as internal and external secondments, coaching, mentoring and leadership development programs (Meyers et al, 2013). In China, TM tends to be HRM-led, and MNEs utilise standardized templates for performance appraisal alongside training and international job rotation and localized inducements including the provision of housing, career development, educational benefits and greater work autonomy (Guthridge et al, 2008, Hartmann et al, 2010.…”
Section: H2 As Compared To Mne Subsidiaries In Turkey Local Turkishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Talent management developed three main areas considered to be talent management. First is the talent management mix of roles, actions, such as: hiring, selection and developing the employees substitution planning and managing [6].…”
Section: Research Objectives (I) To Investigate the Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%