While a number of research studies have been devoted to identifying creative and artistically talented students (Baum, Owen, & Oreck, 2004;Clark & Zimmerman, 2004;Sternberg, 2000), understanding the nature of artistic talents (Evans, Bickel, & Pendarvis, 2004), programming and intervention provided for teenagers talented in the arts (Clark & Zimmerman, 2002;Hunter & Milne, 2005), and even mentoring for creativity (Subotnik, Edmiston, Cook, & Ross, 2010), there remains a paucity of descriptive information about arts students' abilities and characteristics (Cukierkorn, 2008); artistically talented youth are an "underrecognized and understudied population" (Cukierkorn, 2008, p. 26). Apart from the landmark longitudinal study done by Csikszentmihalyi, Rathunde, and Whalen (1996) on experiences of flow and expressed passion in talent domains among talented teenagers, little documentation exists of the flow experience among talented artists-in-training despite the fact that the earlier study indicates that artists' quality of experience is linked to eventual commitment to their art forms.There has been a recent upsurge of interest in creativity and the arts in the Singapore context (Keun & Hunt, 2006;Tan, Ho, & Yong, 2007).