Talking Abortion (Mis)information with ChatGPT on TikTok

Sharevski, Filipo; Loop, Jennifer Vander; Jachim, Peter; Devine, Amy; Pieroni, Emma

doi:10.1109/eurospw59978.2023.00071

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to one systematic review from March 2023, the quality of medical information in Chat-GPT responses is moderate but too unreliable for use in a clinical setting [17]. One early study finds that TikTok users are skeptical of the credibility of health information originating from ChatGPT [18] but, on the whole, the available data tends to prioritize the physician or researcher's perspective. Research at the intersection of dementia and Large Language Models is evolving rapidly, with promising potential applications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Does ChatGPT Know About Dementia? A Comparative Analysis of Information Quality

Dosso,

Kailley,

Robillard

2024

JAD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The quality of information about dementia retrieved using ChatGPT is unknown. Content was evaluated for length, readability, and quality using the QUEST, a validated tool, and compared against online material from three North American organizations. Both sources of information avoided conflicts of interest, supported the patient-physician relationship, and used a balanced tone. Official bodies but not ChatGPT referenced identifiable research and pointed to local resources. Users of ChatGPT are likely to encounter accurate but shallow information about dementia. Recommendations are made for information creators and providers who counsel patients around digital health practices.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%