The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Talking to People III: Expert Interviews and Elite Interviews

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
46
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the research question at hand, in a field where information is scarce, a qualitative approach is recommended to generate a first in-depth insight [155]. Qualitative expert interviews provide details about singular cases [156,157]. As this study is aiming to give a general overview of the subject matter, case examples are the preferable empirical method of usage [158,159].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the research question at hand, in a field where information is scarce, a qualitative approach is recommended to generate a first in-depth insight [155]. Qualitative expert interviews provide details about singular cases [156,157]. As this study is aiming to give a general overview of the subject matter, case examples are the preferable empirical method of usage [158,159].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, process knowledge captures knowledge that is based on practical experience and the institutional context of actions. In this sense, process knowledge emerges due to the position of the person in a process and comprises knowledge about interactions, routines, or social practices (Van Audenhove & Donders, 2019). The third type defined by Bogner and Menz (2009) is the theory-generating expert interview that serves as a starting point for the envisaged methodological development of problem-centred expert interviews and is explained in the following.…”
Section: The Epistemological Interest In Expert Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the researcher might be identified as a potential critic, for instance, because of his or her institutional, organizational, or scientific background. The interviewee may feel criticized by the questions of the interviewer and may doubt his or her objectivity, which can lead to a limited willingness to answer questions (Bogner & Menz, 2009;Van Audenhove & Donders, 2019).…”
Section: The Theory-generating Expert Interviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations