Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3290605.3300807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TalkTraces

Abstract: Topic (columns) vs. Agenda (rows) scatterplot of discussion Transcript of current and previous session Transcript-to-agenda relatedness for previous meeting Real-time transcript-to-agenda relatedness for current meeting transcript relatedness for current relatedness for Previous meeting agenda Current meeting agenda Word cloud for previous meeting Topic (columns) vs. Agenda (rows) scatterplot of discussion 1 2 3 Local/global topic keyword control slider Relevant keywords for topics Real-time speech-totext tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, learning analytics research focused on supporting collaboration and group learning has diversified, and perhaps even fragmented, across various research communities, such as CSCL (e.g., Spikol, Ruffaldi, & Cukurova, 2017a), technologyenhanced learning (e.g., Praharaj, Scheffel, Drachsler, & Specht, 2018), team science (e.g., Kim, Sottilare, Brawner, & Flowers, 2018), and human-computer interaction (e.g., Chandrasegaran, Bryan, Shidara, Chuang, & Ma, 2019). Novel analytic approaches have emerged and are applied to study collaboration with a wide variety of purposes, such as assessment and measurement of collaborative learning (Khan, 2017), theory building (Malmberg et al, 2018), orchestration support (Olsen, 2017), dashboards design (van Leeuwen, Rummel, & van Gog, 2019), and user modelling (Worsley, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, learning analytics research focused on supporting collaboration and group learning has diversified, and perhaps even fragmented, across various research communities, such as CSCL (e.g., Spikol, Ruffaldi, & Cukurova, 2017a), technologyenhanced learning (e.g., Praharaj, Scheffel, Drachsler, & Specht, 2018), team science (e.g., Kim, Sottilare, Brawner, & Flowers, 2018), and human-computer interaction (e.g., Chandrasegaran, Bryan, Shidara, Chuang, & Ma, 2019). Novel analytic approaches have emerged and are applied to study collaboration with a wide variety of purposes, such as assessment and measurement of collaborative learning (Khan, 2017), theory building (Malmberg et al, 2018), orchestration support (Olsen, 2017), dashboards design (van Leeuwen, Rummel, & van Gog, 2019), and user modelling (Worsley, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of examining the data at an aggregate level using visualizations, and then drilling down into detail for a closer inspection and verification of data is one that is well-established in the visual analytics community. Applications for interactive visualizations that combine distant and close reading of text data have gained traction in the digital humanities for examining documents (e.g., Jänicke et al, 2017;Jänicke et al, 2018;Koch et al, 2014) and conversations (e.g., Chandrasegaran et al, 2019;El-Assady et al, 2016). To a lesser extent, these approaches have been applied to examining design sessions (Chandrasegaran et al, 2017a;Chandrasegaran et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, solutions for visualizing and exploring communication in other areas could be used, e.g., TalkTraces used for visualization of verbal communication in meetings [58], Convis for exploring blog post conversations [59], or ConToVi for visualization of multiparty conversations [60].…”
Section: What Forms Of Visualization and Emerging Technologies Could ...mentioning
confidence: 99%