2008
DOI: 10.5802/aif.2378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tame stacks in positive characteristic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
334
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(339 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
334
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…was proved in the case of tame Artin stacks in [34] by using the local structure theorem of [1] to reduce to the case of a quotient stack of an affine scheme by a finite linearly reductive group scheme. As in [34, Theorem 1.7 and 1.8], part (iii) directly implies that that the cohomology and base change theorem and semicontinuity theorem hold for noetherian Artin stacks admitting a proper good moduli space.…”
Section: By Proposition 45 the Natural Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…was proved in the case of tame Artin stacks in [34] by using the local structure theorem of [1] to reduce to the case of a quotient stack of an affine scheme by a finite linearly reductive group scheme. As in [34, Theorem 1.7 and 1.8], part (iii) directly implies that that the cohomology and base change theorem and semicontinuity theorem hold for noetherian Artin stacks admitting a proper good moduli space.…”
Section: By Proposition 45 the Natural Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-If X is an Artin stack over S with finite inertia stack I X → X then by the Keel-Mori Theorem ( [19]) and its generalizations ( [5], [39]), there exists a coarse moduli space φ : X → Y . Abramovich, Olsson and Vistoli in [1] define X to be a tame stack if φ is cohomologically affine in which case φ is a good moduli space. Of those Artin stacks with finite inertia, only tame stacks admit good moduli spaces.…”
Section: Good Moduli Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To prove G/H has no pseudoreflections at the origin, it suffices by Lemma 2.3 to replace k by its algebraic closure. By [Abramovich et al 2008, Lemma 2.11], we see then that G is the semidirect product of its identity where q (u) = (u, qu). We see that Z q is a closed subscheme of U and that Z q (T ) is the set of u ∈ U (T ) which are fixed by q.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%