Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3355369.3355573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taming Anycast in the Wild Internet

Abstract: Anycast is a popular tool for deploying global, widely available systems, including DNS infrastructure and content delivery networks (CDNs). The optimization of these networks often focuses on the deployment and management of anycast sites. However, such approaches fail to consider one of the primary configurations of a large anycast network: the set of networks that receive anycast announcements at each site (i.e., an announcement configuration). Altering these configurations, even without the deployment of a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It plays a vital role for DNS and CDN and services, but different issues have been noted, including the detection latency of IP anycast prefixes [20], AS-level anycast path inflation [21], and client-server mapping limitations that arise in CDN routing [2]. Several enhancements have been discussed focusing on either performance, see, e.g., [22,23], or security, e.g., to mitigate distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks [5]. It has been shown that anycast routing can achieve near-optimal response times and that it can be tailored to suit the QoS requirements of DiffServ networks [24], but these techniques often require knowledge about the global network state (i.e., router loads) [25,26].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It plays a vital role for DNS and CDN and services, but different issues have been noted, including the detection latency of IP anycast prefixes [20], AS-level anycast path inflation [21], and client-server mapping limitations that arise in CDN routing [2]. Several enhancements have been discussed focusing on either performance, see, e.g., [22,23], or security, e.g., to mitigate distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks [5]. It has been shown that anycast routing can achieve near-optimal response times and that it can be tailored to suit the QoS requirements of DiffServ networks [24], but these techniques often require knowledge about the global network state (i.e., router loads) [25,26].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To optimize the DNS resolution performance, the routes between users and the nameservers are heavily engineered. IP anycast is a technique leveraged to this end and it has been measured using passive or active analysis [77], [96], [96]- [99]. On the other hand, route hijack against DNS has been discovered and DNS and routing data are combined to detect such incidents [1], [98], [100]- [102].…”
Section: Measurement On Dns and Routing Jointlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, very recent work by McQuistin et al [35] shows that anycast services that make use of multiple network operators can benefit from tailoring their BGP announcements to optimise end-user performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%