2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taming systems to create enabling environments for HCV treatment: Negotiating trust in the drug and alcohol setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our formative research adds to the conceptual and implementation science literature around MAT service delivery in limited resource settings (Chawarski, Zhou, & Schottenfeld, 2011; Gu et al, 2013; Rhodes et al, 2015; Tran et al, 2015), delineating the key role that trust/mistrust plays in the treatment enrollment process and how this differs by gender. Literature from other contexts has explored how felt and anticipated stigma shaped mistrust of medical interventions in PWID (Harris, Rhodes, & Martin, 2013; Treloar, Rance, Yates, & Mao, 2015). Our findings identified similar mechanisms underlying weak care engagement in WWID, due to particularly strong social and cultural stigma that generated mistrust of PWID by families and communities and mistrust in PWID of medical settings and outsiders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our formative research adds to the conceptual and implementation science literature around MAT service delivery in limited resource settings (Chawarski, Zhou, & Schottenfeld, 2011; Gu et al, 2013; Rhodes et al, 2015; Tran et al, 2015), delineating the key role that trust/mistrust plays in the treatment enrollment process and how this differs by gender. Literature from other contexts has explored how felt and anticipated stigma shaped mistrust of medical interventions in PWID (Harris, Rhodes, & Martin, 2013; Treloar, Rance, Yates, & Mao, 2015). Our findings identified similar mechanisms underlying weak care engagement in WWID, due to particularly strong social and cultural stigma that generated mistrust of PWID by families and communities and mistrust in PWID of medical settings and outsiders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific ways in which OST may be delivered, and in which OST settings are frequently configured in health systems, can be perceived by PWID, and can sometimes be, stigmatizing, controlling and demoralizing. (Bourgois, 2000; Fraser, 2006) The physical and operational separation of OST treatment settings from other aspects health care, embodying the marginalization and stigmatization of drug use and the treatment of opioid dependence, and systems which rely on surveillance, control and power differentials between PWID and staff, (Bourgois, 2000; Fraser, 2006; Harris, Rhodes, & Martin, 2013; Rance, Newland, Hopwood, & Treloar, 2012) have implications for trust, ethics, and use of OST for HCV prevention and care engagement (as well as for HIV prevention, overdose prevention, and the reduction of other adverse consequences of drug use).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barriers to care at the level of the patient, provider and systems levels (Bruggmann & Grebely, 2015;Grebely & Tyndall, 2011;Harris, Rhodes, & Martin, 2013) have resulted in low HCV treatment uptake among PWID in many settings (Alavi et al, 2014;Iversen et al, 2014;Strathdee et al, 2005;Wiessing et al, 2014). However, broadened HCV treatment access in many populations has been limited by criminalisation of drug use, discrimination and stigma in health settings and arduous, poorly tolerated interferon-based therapies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%