Three different carbonyl components are assembled to tetrahydropyran-2,4-diols by two successive diastereoselective aldol reactions.Contrary to the ample usage of the aldol reaction in domino/ tandem 1 processes. 2,3 its use in two consecutive aldol-aldol reactions is rare 4 and often limited to trimerisation protocols. 5 We have recently outlined the first examples of a highly diastereoselective and widely applicable one-pot dominoaldol-aldol-hemiacetal strategy using metal bisenolates (or polyenolates) 3 and various aldehydes 2 (Scheme 1, top route, R 1 = R 4 ; R 2 = R 5 ) 6 yielding tetrahydropyran-2,4-diols 8 along the E1 + E1 + A route (using only one enol E1 and one aldehyde A). We now wish to report the first case of an E1 + E2 + A aldol-aldol protocol to yield structurally diversified tetrahydropyran-2,4-diols with up to 5 different groups R in a highly stereoselective manner.As 4 is a plausible intermediate (the metal center coordinates both to the aldolate ‡ and enolate) in the E1 + E1 + A reaction, 6 we contemplated realising the elusive E1 + E2 + A aldol-aldol reaction via its structural analogue 7. In such an approach, however, one has to worry that rapid retro-aldol reaction, as observed in the E1 + E1 + A route (4 ? 3 + 2), leads to a disastrous scrambling of the enol components, most likely the reason why any E1 + E2 + A reaction has been intangible so far.Realistically, the E1 + E2 + A aldol-aldol reaction can only be orchestrated when (i) an adequate way to assemble the desired intermediate 7 is found, and (ii) a metal is met that renders the 2. aldol step (Scheme 1) more rapid than retro-aldol reaction. 7 may originate from the reaction of mono-aldolate 5·Li with metal enolate 6. (pathway 1, Scheme 2; X = leaving group) or alternatively from lithium enolate 10 and metal aldolate 9 (pathway 2). Independent of the pathway the aldolate must have the correct relative anti configuration as in the tetrahydropyran-2,4-diol.Following our earlier results, 6 the influence of various metal fragments (MX m + n = TiCl 4 , TiCl 4 -Bu 3 N, Ti(OiPr) 2 Cl 2 , ZrCl 4 , SnCl 4 , InCl 3 , AlCl 3 , and ZnCl 2 ) in the reaction of metal enolate 6a (R 4 = Et, R 5 = Me) with anti 5a·Li 7 (R 1 = Ph, R 2 = Me, R 3 = Ph; d.e. = 75%) to afford 8a as the E1 + E2 + A product was explored (Scheme 3). From the metal fragments, only ZrCl 4 (19%), SnCl 4 (28%), InCl 3 (7%) and ZnCl 2 (14%) afforded 8a in some detectable yield.Most importantly, however, no retro-aldol cleavage of 5a was observed with SnCl 4 , whereas use of ZrCl 4 , InCl 3 , and ZnCl 2 led additionally to tetrahydropyran-2,4-diol 11, propiophenone and b-hydroxyketone 12, in particular at higher temperatures. The formation of the latter compounds unequivocally indicates occurrence of the unwanted retro-aldol reaction. Thus, the reaction was optimized with SnCl 4 varying the temperature, reaction time and stoichiometry. Finally, 8a was furnished in 63% at 40 °C, 4 h using SnCl 4 +enolate+monoaldolate = 1+2+2 attesting that two molecules of 8a form in the coor...