2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TandemHeart as a Rescue Therapy for Patients With Critical Aortic Valve Stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Tandem Heart and the Impella have been used successfully in several different clinical settings ranging from a bridge to transplant, to high-risk percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization,[68][71] severe allograft rejection[72] during high-risk abdominal surgery,[73] and recovery from fulminant miocarditis,[74] or as a rescue in critical aortic valve stenosis [75]. These two kinds of pump mainly suffered from technical and constructive drawbacks, including the interatrial septal course for the Tandem Heart and the low pump power with 2.5 L/min of flow for the Impella.…”
Section: Indications Results and Limitations Of Percutaneous Partialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tandem Heart and the Impella have been used successfully in several different clinical settings ranging from a bridge to transplant, to high-risk percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization,[68][71] severe allograft rejection[72] during high-risk abdominal surgery,[73] and recovery from fulminant miocarditis,[74] or as a rescue in critical aortic valve stenosis [75]. These two kinds of pump mainly suffered from technical and constructive drawbacks, including the interatrial septal course for the Tandem Heart and the low pump power with 2.5 L/min of flow for the Impella.…”
Section: Indications Results and Limitations Of Percutaneous Partialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, Moreno et al reported the experience of aortic valvuloplasty in the setting of cardiogenic shock without PVAD (n = 21) 12 . Later, Gregoric et al implanted a TandemHeart® in AS patients also presenting with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest (n = 10) 9 . Based on these reports, two groups appeared to do better when PVAD (TandemHeart®) was used: high‐risk AS patients during BAV and patients with AS in cardiogenic shock prior to aortic valve replacement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both have been used primarily in cases of high‐risk coronary intervention in the setting of low‐left ventricular systolic function 2–5 . The use of these two devices has been described in only a few cases of severe aortic stenosis (AS) 6–9 . However, AS has been an exclusion criterion during clinical trials using the Impella, due in part to the fear of placing a relatively stiff 12‐Fr catheter across a stenotic aortic valve 2,7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study of eight patients presenting with aortic stenosis and either cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock, support provided by early placement of the TandemHeart Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device (pVAD; Cardiac Assist, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA) allowed successful conventional AVR with only one in-hospital death 13. The role of surgically implantable left ventricular assist devices, using rotary-pump technology to provide continuous blood flow,14 has yet to be tested in patients with critical aortic stenosis.…”
Section: Left Ventricular Assist Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%