2008
DOI: 10.2473/journalofmmij.124.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tangent Modulus Method, Applicability to Three Types of Rock and Influence of Confining Pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results confirmed that the bending point appeared at the preloading stress level in porous rocks, such as Shirahama sandstone (Fig. 2a) and Kimachi sandstone that both date to the Miocene age, and in a Pleistocene Shikotsu welded tuff under dry conditions (Fujii et al, 2003;Fujii et al, 2008). The bending point was discernible although not quite distinctive in a hard and crystalline Inada granite (Fig.…”
Section: Tangent Modulus Methodssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results confirmed that the bending point appeared at the preloading stress level in porous rocks, such as Shirahama sandstone (Fig. 2a) and Kimachi sandstone that both date to the Miocene age, and in a Pleistocene Shikotsu welded tuff under dry conditions (Fujii et al, 2003;Fujii et al, 2008). The bending point was discernible although not quite distinctive in a hard and crystalline Inada granite (Fig.…”
Section: Tangent Modulus Methodssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The bending point was discernible although not quite distinctive in a hard and crystalline Inada granite (Fig. 2b; Fujii et al, 2008). The strengths of these rocks are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Tangent Modulus Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%