2017
DOI: 10.2308/accr-51815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tangible Long-Lived Asset Impairments and Future Operating Cash Flows under U.S. GAAP and IFRS

Abstract: This paper investigates the predictive value of tangible long-lived asset impairments for changes in future operating cash flows under U.S. GAAP and IFRS. We find that impairments reported under IFRS are negatively associated with changes in future operating cash flows, whereas those under U.S. GAAP, on average, are not. We investigate whether differences in the predictive value are attributable to differences in recognition or measurement, providing evidence suggesting that impairment recognition under U.S. G… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Keeping the differences in mind, IFRS impairments are expected to have incremental predictive value beyond those under U.S. GAAP. Gordon and Hsu (2018) find that impairments reported under IFRS are negatively associated with changes in future operating cash flows, whereas those under U.S. GAAP, on average, are not. Additional tests suggest that impairment recognition under U.S. GAAP is delayed.…”
Section: Overlap Of Judgement Areas and Significant Measurement Diffementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Keeping the differences in mind, IFRS impairments are expected to have incremental predictive value beyond those under U.S. GAAP. Gordon and Hsu (2018) find that impairments reported under IFRS are negatively associated with changes in future operating cash flows, whereas those under U.S. GAAP, on average, are not. Additional tests suggest that impairment recognition under U.S. GAAP is delayed.…”
Section: Overlap Of Judgement Areas and Significant Measurement Diffementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Kedua organisasi ini berbeda dalam membuat kebijakan terkait penurunan nilai aset tetap. Di Amerika, FASB tidak memperkenankan perusahaan untuk melakukan pemulihan (restoration) atas nilai aset tetap yang telah diturunkan pada periode sebelumnya, tetapi IASB mengizinkan untuk melakukan pemulihan (reversal) atas nilai aset tetap yang telah diturunkan pada periode sebelumnya (Gordon & Hsu, 2018;Hong et al, 2018). Dari regulasi kedua organisasi yang berbeda tersebut, apakah karakteristik kualitatif dari representasi sesungguhnya (faithful representation) lebih optimal menggunakan regulasi dari FASB atau IASB merupakan pertanyaan dalam studi ini yang perlu diinvestigasi lebih lanjut.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Revaluasi awal menghasilkan penurunan nilai (downward revaluation), maka kerugian ini dilaporkan di laba bersih. Jika revaluasi berikutnya menghasilkan kenaikan, maka kenaikan ini dilaporkan di laba bersih sebatas penurunan nilai yang dilaporkan pada periode sebelumnya (Gordon & Hsu, 2018;KPMG, 2020). Akan tetapi, jika revaluasi awal menghasilkan kenaikan nilai (upward revaluation), maka kenaikan nilai ini diakui di laba komprehensif lain dengan judul surplus revaluasi dan jika terdapat penurunan nilai pada saat revaluasi berikutnya, maka penurunan nilai ini dilaporkan di laba komprehensif (IASB, 2009).…”
Section: Teori Agensiunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gordon and Hsu [18] studied the relationship between impairments recorded in non-current assets and future cashflows of companies. They analyzed data from about 5,400 companies in 26 countries that in some cases used IFRS and in other US GAAP standards.…”
Section: Studies Analyzed About the Importance Of Impairmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%