2020
DOI: 10.1596/34620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tanzania Health Sector Public Expenditure Review 2020

Abstract: Some rights reservedThis work is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, donor funding was seen by some interviewees as key to the successful implementation of any plan; thus, if donors exit a country or withdraw funding, a huge financial resource disappears, which will make implementation even more difficult. A 2020 report from the World Bank suggested that Tanzania’s spend on health is insufficient to allow everyone to access quality health services, and that per capita spend on health was 28.5 USD in 2017, an increase from 23.6 USD in 2010 [ 23 ]. The report also found that the health sector is over-reliant on donors, with the government providing approximately 40% of the total spend on public health [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, donor funding was seen by some interviewees as key to the successful implementation of any plan; thus, if donors exit a country or withdraw funding, a huge financial resource disappears, which will make implementation even more difficult. A 2020 report from the World Bank suggested that Tanzania’s spend on health is insufficient to allow everyone to access quality health services, and that per capita spend on health was 28.5 USD in 2017, an increase from 23.6 USD in 2010 [ 23 ]. The report also found that the health sector is over-reliant on donors, with the government providing approximately 40% of the total spend on public health [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 , 52 The DHFF system acts as a bridge between central government (Ministry of Finance and Planning) and local government authorities the primary health facilities in which funds are directly transferred from the Ministry of Finance and planning to frontline primary health facilities. 53 The shift aimed to increase service delivery efficiency by reducing leakages and enhancing predictability and timeliness of funds received at primary health facilities. 41 , 54…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PlanRep is a planning and reporting database used by local government authorities during planning and reporting, facility budget is governed by previous financial year annual revenue collection as budget sealing cut off point from central government to local government and partly is driven by consideration of population size of respective health facilities. 53 , 54…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations