2022
DOI: 10.14778/3538598.3538616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TAOBench

Abstract: The continued emergence of large social network applications has introduced a scale of data and query volume that challenges the limits of existing data stores. However, few benchmarks accurately simulate these request patterns, leaving researchers in short supply of tools to evaluate and improve upon these systems. In this paper, we present a new benchmark, TAOBench, that captures the social graph workload at Meta. We open source workload configurations along with a benchmark that leverages these request feat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a recent study reveals that TPC-C, essentially as an I/O benchmark, may not be ideal for benchmarking concurrency control algorithms [50]. We could therefore consider benchmarks with realistic workloads (e.g., highlyskewed transactions [11]) which are also suitable for concurrency control, or even design new ones, e.g., by creating hot warehouses in TPC-C with YCSB's Zipfian or hotspot distribution [50]. Ultimately, we could use realistic transaction workloads collected from production systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a recent study reveals that TPC-C, essentially as an I/O benchmark, may not be ideal for benchmarking concurrency control algorithms [50]. We could therefore consider benchmarks with realistic workloads (e.g., highlyskewed transactions [11]) which are also suitable for concurrency control, or even design new ones, e.g., by creating hot warehouses in TPC-C with YCSB's Zipfian or hotspot distribution [50]. Ultimately, we could use realistic transaction workloads collected from production systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%