2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-326x(02)00057-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tar ball frequency data and analytical results from a long-term beach monitoring program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Particularly affected were the shores of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida. 2–4 Though the thick slick of oil is no longer a great threat to the ecosystem, long-term consequences are hard to predict.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Particularly affected were the shores of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida. 2–4 Though the thick slick of oil is no longer a great threat to the ecosystem, long-term consequences are hard to predict.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the findings of Butler et al ( 1998 ), areas of divergence had minimal tar quantities. Beached tar surveys have been conducted to measure tar balls occurring near Coal Oil Point on the California coast, a well-known region of natural oil seeps (Del Sontro et al 2007 ) and along the Oregon coast to monitor effects of the New Carissa spill in 1999 (Owens et al 2002 ). Del Sontro et al ( 2007 ) found seasonal trends in total tar accumulation in which summer quantities were an order of magnitude higher than winter quantities; a multiple regression analysis revealed that 34 % of the tar variability was explained by a combination of onshore advection via wind and low swell heights inhibiting slick dispersion.…”
Section: Distribution and Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Del Sontro et al ( 2007 ) found seasonal trends in total tar accumulation in which summer quantities were an order of magnitude higher than winter quantities; a multiple regression analysis revealed that 34 % of the tar variability was explained by a combination of onshore advection via wind and low swell heights inhibiting slick dispersion. Along the Oregon coast, Owens et al ( 2002 ) found that 48 % of the collected tar balls were not consistent with those from the new Carissa source oils, and therefore were a result of “background oiling,” not associated with specific known events. The authors note that this is an important consideration that must be considered when developing cleanup criteria.…”
Section: Distribution and Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denser-than-water (i.e., non-floating) tar balls may also be formed and beached as a result of the inclusion of sand and other solids (Iliffe and Knap, 1979) or by wave action on subtidal nearshore oil deposits (Bernabeu et al, 2013). Because floating tar balls can be transported over large distances by ocean currents, their presence has been widely reported in the waters and on the shorelines of the world's seas and ocean (Kvenvolden et al, 1995;Coles and Al-Riyami, 1996;Joyce, 1998;Kornilios et al, 1998;Zakaria et al, 2001;Owens et al, 2002;Nemirovskaya, 2011;Suneel et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%