“…Although conventional gas detection methods, such as gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, quantum cascade lasers, infrared laser spectroscopy, and fluorescence spectrometry, provide high accuracy, these instruments are bulky, lack portability, and are expensive. – Chemiresistive gas sensors, which are the most ubiquitous type of gas sensors, have garnered increased interest due to their rapid response, good accuracy, cost effectiveness, easy fabrication processes, and flexible configuration capabilities . Metal oxide semiconductors (MOS) have been widely used as gas sensing materials in chemiresistive gas sensors due to excellent sensing performance such as high sensitivity and fast response and recovery time. – Among the diverse range of metal oxides, WO 3 is one of the most attractive MOS sensing materials in which the robust empirical evidence demonstrates its impressive sensitivity toward NO 2 , NH 3 , and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). ,– Its band gap energy of around 2.4 to 2.8 eV, and abundant oxygen vacancies suggest a significant promise for its application in H 2 S detection. , Unfortunately, pristine WO 3 does not respond well to H 2 S. For example, Urasinska-Wojcik et al reported a WO 3 -based sensor only exhibited a response ( R air / R gas ) of 1.4 toward 100 ppb H 2 S . Herein, several strategies from morphology to composition modulation have been proposed to modulate the material properties, which could contribute to the enhancement of gas sensing performance. ,, 1-Dimensional (1-D) nanostructures are highly considered as the top choice for gas sensing material morphology due to their large surface area to volume ratio that enhances their reactive and interactive potential .…”