2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target identification using bistatic high‐resolution range profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a BMD system to intercept the space targets in this phase, it is important to distinguish the space targets from debris and decoys. For this purpose, the HRRP and inverse-synthetic aperture radar (ISAR) images are used [4,5], but it is difficult to expect good performance due to the similar shape of decoys and space targets. Unlike conventional radar signatures such as HRRP and ISAR images, research on identifying targets using micro-Doppler signatures has been extensively studied for decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a BMD system to intercept the space targets in this phase, it is important to distinguish the space targets from debris and decoys. For this purpose, the HRRP and inverse-synthetic aperture radar (ISAR) images are used [4,5], but it is difficult to expect good performance due to the similar shape of decoys and space targets. Unlike conventional radar signatures such as HRRP and ISAR images, research on identifying targets using micro-Doppler signatures has been extensively studied for decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to discriminate the warhead from the decoy. However, conventional methods based on the range profile and the inverse synthetic aperture image in [1] and [2] have limited ability to discriminate them because of the similarity in shape and the overall trajectory of the warhead and the decoy. The problems of existing methods can be overcome by exploitingthe difference in their micro-Doppler (MD) effect [3][4][5][6][7][8]; the warhead is much heavier due to various devices, and thus its micromotion is dif-ferent from that of the decoy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Guo et al utilized one-dimensional residual-inception network to recognize HRRPs [11]. To improve the ability of recognizing HRRPs with bistatic radar, RELAX method and novel feature extraction processing have been used [12]. Nevertheless, the difficulties in recognizing HRRPs under the condition of low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) have not been solved effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%